The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
good fortune he has secured the signet ring of Rākṣasa, dropped by the
former in pulling indoors the child. Cāṇakya sees his chance; he writes
a letter, has it copied in good faith by Çakaṭadāsa and sealed with
Rākṣasa’s seal; Çakaṭadāsa is then arrested, but on the point of
impalement is rescued by Siddhārthaka, another spy of the minister’s,
who flees to Rākṣasa; Jīvasiddhi is banished in ignominy to the same
destination, and Candanadāsa is flung into prison, to await death for
having harboured Rākṣasa’s family, which has escaped. Finally, it is
reported that Bhāgurāyaṇa and others of the court are also fled, news
received by Cāṇakya with admirable composure, for they are also his
emissaries.
Act II shows Rākṣasa’s counter-plots. Virādhaka, in a serpent-charmer’s
disguise, bears him news of ill import: the scheme to murder
Candragupta, as he passed under a coronation arch, has failed,
Vairodhaka, uncle of Malayaketu, who stayed when his nephew fled and
had been crowned also as lord of half the realm, being slain in lieu of
Candragupta; Abhayadatta, who offered him poison, has been forced to
drink the draught; Pramodaka, the chamberlain, has flaunted the wealth
sent to him to use in bribes, and is dead in misery; the bold spirits,
who were to issue from a subterranean passage into the king’s
bedchamber, have been detected by the king through the sight of ants
bearing a recent meal, and burnt in agony in their hiding place;
Jīvasiddhi is banished, Çakaṭadāsa condemned to the stake, Candanadāsa
to the same fate. The tale of woe is interrupted by the advent of
Çakaṭadāsa with Siddhārthaka, who restores his seal to Rākṣasa, saying
he had picked it up at Candanadāsa’s house, and begs permission to
remain in his train. Virādhaka now gives the one piece of good news:
Candragupta is tired of Cāṇakya. At this moment Rākṣasa is asked if he
will buy some precious jewels, and hastily bids Çakaṭadāsa see to the
price, little knowing that they are sent by Cāṇakya to entrap him. Act
III displays Cāṇakya at his ablest; a fine scene takes place between
him and Candragupta, on the score that he has forbidden all feasting
without telling the king; the monarch finally upbraids him, the
minister taunts him with ingratitude and insolence, resigns office, and
leaves in high dudgeon; none but the chief actors know the whole is but
a ruse, and Rākṣasa’s fortunes seem again fair. In Act IV the bright
prospect begins to darken; Bhāgurāyaṇa, for the officials who have
deserted to Malayaketu, explains to that monarch that they desire to
deal direct with him, not Rākṣasa; the latter, they suggest, is no real
foe of Candragupta; if Cāṇakya were out of the way, there would be
nothing to hinder his allying himself with Candragupta. The king is
perplexed, and his doubt increases when he overhears a conversation
between Rākṣasa and a courier who bears the glad tidings of the split
between the king and Cāṇakya; Rākṣasa eagerly exclaims that Candragupta
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account