The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
is now in the palms of his hands (hastatalagata), a phrase which
unhappily lends itself to the suspicious interpretation that he
meditates alliance with that king. Malayaketu’s conversation with
Rākṣasa, which ensues, leaves him half-hearted for an advance, for he
cannot rid himself of his suspicions of the minister. The Act ends with
Jīvasiddhi’s admission to see Rākṣasa, who asks him in vain for
intelligible advice as to the time for an advance, receiving in lieu
much astrological lore and what is really a presage of disaster. This
is achieved in Act V. First Jīvasiddhi approaches Bhāgurāyaṇa, who is
entrusted with the grant of permits to leave the camp, and admits—with
feigned reluctance—in order to get a permit, that he fears Rākṣasa, who
used him formerly when he was arranging for the poisoning of Parvateça,
but now seeks to slay him. The king, who overhears this, is wild with
rage; he had deemed his father slain by Cāṇakya, and Bhāgurāyaṇa has
great difficulty in persuading him that Rākṣasa’s action might be
deemed justifiable, and that at any rate vengeance must wait.
Siddhārthaka, however, now appears a prisoner, caught trying to escape
without a passport; beaten, he finally gives evidence against Rākṣasa
in the shape of the letter written in Act I by Çakaṭadāsa, which he
asserts he was to bear from Rākṣasa to Candragupta, a jewel sealed,
like the letter, with Rākṣasa’s seal—one given by Malayaketu to Rākṣasa
and by him to Siddhārthaka for rescuing Çakaṭadāsa, and a verbal
message, stating the terms demanded by the allied kings for their
treachery, and Rākṣasa’s own demand, the removal of Cāṇakya. The king
confronts Rākṣasa with the proofs, and the minister has made his case
worse from the start, for, asked the order of march proposed, he
assigns to the allied kings the proud duty of guarding the king’s
person, which Malayaketu interprets as a device to facilitate their
treachery. Rākṣasa is bewildered; he can deny the message, but the seal
and the writing are genuine; can Çakaṭadāsa have turned traitor through
fear? The argument against him is clinched by the king’s seeing that he
wears a fine jewel, one of those purchased at the close of Act II; it
was the king’s father’s, and must, he insists, be the price of the
minister’s treachery. Incensed, the foolish king gives orders to bury
alive those allied kings who craved territory as their reward, and to
trample under elephants those who sought them as their share. All is
confusion, and Rākṣasa, insolently spared, slips away to fulfil his
duty of rescuing his friend Candanadāsa.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account