The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
In the Mahāvrata [24] we find elements which are of importance as
indicating the materials from which the drama might develop. The
Mahāvrata is plainly a rite intended to strengthen at the winter
solstice the sun, so that it may resume its vigour and make fruitful
the earth. Now an essential part of the rite is a struggle between a
Vaiçya, whose colour is to be white, and a Çūdra, black in colour, over
a round white skin, which ultimately falls to the victorious Vaiçya. It
is impossible, without ignoring the obvious nature of this rite, not to
see in it a mimic contest to gain the sun, the power of light, the
Aryan, striving against that of darkness, the Çūdra. In the face of the
ethnological parallels it is impossible also to sever this episode from
the numerous forms of the contest of summer and winter, the first
represented by the white Aryan, the second by the dark Çūdra. We have
in fact a primitive dramatic ritual, and one which it may be added was
popular throughout the Vedic age. The same ceremony is also marked by a
curious episode; a Brahmin student and a hetaera are introduced as
engaged in coarse abuse of each other, and in the older form of the
ritual we actually find that sexual union as a fertility rite is
permitted, though later taste dismissed the practice as undesirable.
The ritual purpose of this abuse is undeniable; it is aimed at
producing fertility, and has a precise parallel in the untranslatable
language employed in the horse sacrifice during the period when the
unlucky chief queen is compelled to lie beside the slaughtered horse,
in order to secure, we may assume, the certainty of obtaining a son for
the monarch whose conquests are thus celebrated. [25]
There are, however, nothing but elements here, and we have reasonable
certainty that no drama was known. In the Yajurveda we have long lists
of persons of every kind covering every possible sort of occupation,
and the term Naṭa, which is normally the designation of the actor in
the later literature is unknown. We find but one term [26] which later
ever has that sense, Çailūṣa, and there is nothing whatever to show
that an actor here is meant; a musician or a dancer may be denoted, for
both dancing and singing are mentioned in close proximity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account