The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
The Bālarāmāyaṇa shows to perfection Rājaçekhara’s own estimate of
himself. He traces his poetic descent from Vālmīki, through
Bhartṛmeṇṭha and Bhavabhūti, but it is not clear that Bhartṛmeṇṭha must
be assumed to have dramatized the work, and the little we know of this
obscure person merely shows that he wrote an epic, the Hayagrīvavadha,
while his date is involved in the problems of Vikramāditya and
Mātṛgupta. [488]
5. THE DRAMAS OF RĀJAÇEKHARA
The Bālarāmāyaṇa [489] is a Mahānāṭaka, that is one in ten acts, and
the author, to add to the horror of the length, has expanded the
prologue to almost the dimensions of an act, celebrating his
non-existent merits, and has expanded each act to almost the dimensions
of a Nāṭikā. The whole has 741 stanzas, and of these no less than 203
are in the 19-syllable Çārdūlavikrīḍita and 89 in the Sragdharā, which
has two more syllables in each pada or 84 in a stanza. The play has a
certain novelty, because the author has made the love of Rāvaṇa the
dominating feature. He appears in person in the first act, but declines
to test himself by drawing Çiva’s bow, and departs, menacing evil to
any husband of Sītā. In Act II he seeks the aid of Paraçurāma, but is
insulted instead, and a battle barely prevented by intervention of
friends. In Act III the marriage of Sītā is enacted before him to
distract his amorous sorrow, but the attempt is as little a success as
it deserved to be; he interrupts, and finally the scene has to be
broken off. In Act IV the duel of Rāma and Paraçurāma is disposed of,
but in Act V we find another ludicrous effort to amuse Rāvaṇa; dolls
with parrots in their mouths are presented to him as Sītā and his
foster sister; he is deceived until he finds that his grasp is on wood;
distracted, he demands his beloved from nature, the seasons, the
streams, and the birds, as does Purūravas in the Vikramorvaçī. The
arrival of Çūrpaṇakhā, his sister, who has suffered severely from her
attack on Rāma, brings him to a condition of more manly rage. A tedious
Act then carries matters down to the death of the sorrowing Daçaratha.
In Act VII the problem of inducing the ocean to accept the burden of
the bridge is solved; Dadhittha and Kapittha, two monkeys, describe at
length its construction to Rāma. A momentary terror is caused by a
stratagem of Mālyavant; the severed head of Sītā seems to be flung on
the shore, but it speaks and reveals the fraud; it is the head of the
speaking doll. In Act VIII we have Rāvaṇa’s impressions as disaster
after disaster is announced; he sends out Kumbhakarṇa, but sees even
him helpless, despite his magic weapons, before Rāma. In Act IX Indra
himself describes the last desperate duel of Rāma and Rāvaṇa. In Act X
the party of Rāma makes the usual aerial tour of India, including the
world of the moon, and ending with the inevitable consecration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account