The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
abhimukhapatayālubhir lalāṭa—: çramasalilair avadhūtapattralekhaḥ
kathayati puruṣāyitaṁ vadhūnām: mṛditahimadyutidurmanāḥ kapolaḥ.
‘Its painted mark obliterated by the moisture which streams from the
wearied brow over the face, the cheek reveals the longing of women,
melancholy as the wan moon.’
udeṣyatpīyūṣadyutirucikaṇārdrāḥ çaçimaṇi—
sthalīnām panthāno ghanacaraṇalākṣālipibhṛtaḥ
cakorair uḍḍīnair jhaṭiti kṛtaçan̄kāḥ pratipadam
parācaḥ saṁcārān avinayavatīnāṁ vivṛṇate.
‘Footprints on pavements of moonstone, marked with the lac that dyes
deep the feet, wet with drops that have the radiance of rising cream,
made with anxiety at every step as the Cakoras fly up disturbed, mark
the departure of ladies who violate decorum.’ [485]
A further stanza in some manuscripts of the poem occurs in the drama,
while elsewhere it seems to be treated as a verse about Murāri: [486]
devīṁ vācam upāsate hi bahavaḥ sāraṁ tu sārasvatam
jānīte nitarām asau gurukulakliṣṭo Murāriḥ kaviḥ
abdhir lan̄ghita eva vānarabhaṭaiḥ kiṁ tv asyā gambhīratām
āpātālanimagnapīvaratanur jānāti manthācalaḥ.
‘Many serve the goddess speech, but the essence of eloquence Murāri
alone knows to the full, that poet who long toiled in the house of his
teacher; even so the monkey host leapt over the ocean, but its depth
the Mount of Churning alone knows, for its mighty mass penetrated down
even to the realms below.’
4. THE DATE OF RĀJAÇEKHARA
Rājaçekhara, with the usual prolixity of bad poets, is voluble on his
personality; he was of a Mahārāṣṭra Kṣatriya family of the Yāyāvaras,
who claimed descent from Rāma; son of the minister Durduka or Duhika,
and of Çīlavatī; grandson of Akālajalada, and descendant of Surānanda,
Tarala, and Kavirāja, all poets of name. He married Avantisundarī of
the Cāhamāna family, and was a moderate Çaiva. [487]
In the Karpūramañjarī, probably his first play since it was produced at
the request of his wife, and not a king, he refers to himself as the
teacher of Nirbhaya or Nirbhara, who was clearly the Pratihāra king,
Mahendrapāla of Mahodaya or Kanyakubja, of whom we have records in A.D.
893 and 907. The Bālarāmāyaṇa was produced at his request. But he seems
then to have visited another court, for the Viddhaçālabhañjikā was
produced for the Kalacuri king, Yuvarāja Keyūravarṣa of Tripurī. But,
as the unfinished Bālabhārata was written for Mahīpāla, successor of
Mahendrapāla, whose records begin in A.D. 914, we may assume that he
returned to the court of the Pratihāras and died there. In the
Bālarāmāyaṇa he speaks of six of his works, not apparently including
the Viddhaçālabhañjikā and the Bālabhārata, and in fact we have many
stanzas from him regarding famous authors, though of course the proof
of derivation from this Rājaçekara is not always complete.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account