The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
show how far the vernaculars had advanced beyond the Prākrits of the
drama.
It would, however, be quite unjust to deny to Rājaçekhara the power of
effective expression; like all the later dramatists he is capable of
producing elegant and attractive verses, which are largely spoiled in
their context by their being embedded in masses of tasteless matter.
Thus the benediction of the Viddhaçālabhañjikā is decidedly graceful:
kulagurur abalānāṁ kelidīkṣāpradāne
paramasuhṛd anan̄go rohiṇīvallabhasya
api kusumapṛṣatkair devadevasya jetā
jayati suratalīlānāṭikāsūtradhāraḥ.
‘Family preceptor of young maidens for the bestowal of the sacrament of
love, the bodyless one, dearest friend of Rohiṇī’s lover, he that with
his flower arrows overthrew the god of gods, he is victorious ever, the
director of the comedy of the play of love’s mysteries.’
The description of summer is also pretty if banal:
rajaniviramayāmeṣv ādiçantī ratecchām
kim api kaṭhinayantī nārikelīphalāmbhaḥ
api pariṇamayitrī rājarambhāphalānām
dinapariṇatiramyā vartate grīṣmalakṣmīḥ.
‘This is the glorious season of summer, delightful in the length of the
days, when the royal plantain fruits are ripened, and the milk in the
coco-nut is hardened, and the season bids us enjoy the delight of love
in the closing watches of the night.’
The signs of a maiden distracted by unfulfilled affection are quaintly
described:
candraṁ candanakardamena likhitaṁ sā mārṣṭi daṣṭādharā
bandhyaṁ nindati yac ca manmatham asau bhan̄ktvāgrahastān̄gurīḥ
kāmaḥ puṣpaçaraḥ kileti sumanovargaṁ lunīte ca yat
tat kāmyā subhaga tvayā varatanur vātūlatāṁ lambhitā.
‘Biting her lip, she wipes out the figure of the moon sketched in
sandal paste; snapping her finger-tips she mocks at love as barren; to
flout his darts, the flowers she gathers she tears in shreds; assuredly
the fair one whom thou shouldst love hath been brought by thee to
madness.’
antastāraṁ taralitatalāḥ stokam utpīḍabhājaḥ
pakṣmāgreṣu grathitapṛṣataḥ kīrṇadhārāḥ krameṇa
cittātan̄kaṁ nijagarimataḥ samyag āsūtrayanto
niryānty asyāḥ kuvalayadṛço bāṣpavārām pravāhāḥ.
‘Rippled on the surface of the pupil, slightly foaming, forming drops
on the tips of the lashes, then slowly issuing in streams, betokening
by their weight her heart’s sorrow, there pour forth from the
lotus-eyed one the floods of her tears.’
Of all the plays the Karpūramañjarī is undoubtedly that which contains
the most substantial evidence that Rājaçekhara had some real poetic
talent, despite the banality and stupidity of his conception of love in
Act III. The swing scene contains really effective lines of
word-painting, in harmonious metre: [493]
vicchaanto ṇaararamaṇīmaṇḍalassāṇaṇāiṁ
viccholanto gaaṇakuharaṁ kantijoṇhājaleṇa
pecchantīṇaṁ hiaaṇihiaṁ ṇiddalanto a dappaṁ
dolālīlāsaralataralo dīsae se muhendū.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account