The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
We find already in Bhāsa the formal distinction of introductory scenes
into Viṣkambhakas of two kinds, according as Sanskrit alone or Sanskrit
and Prākrit are used and Praveçakas; in the former the number of
interlocutors is three in two [206] cases against one or two as usual
later; there are other signs of his fondness for triads. [207] The
introduction normally is styled Sthāpanā, [208] not as later
Prastāvanā, and it is extremely simple; after a Nāndī, not preserved,
has been pronounced—perhaps behind the scene—the director enters,
utters a benediction, and is about to make an announcement when a sound
is heard which leads up to the actual drama. No mention of the poet’s
name or the work is found, but these we may suggest were left to the
preliminaries which even in the Nāṭyaçāstra were elaborate, and which
doubtless were performed before Bhāsa’s plays, as they were essentially
religious rites in honour of the gods. On the other hand, the close,
the Bharatavākya, of the later theory is varied in Bhāsa. The
conventions as to the use of speech, aloud, aside to another, or to the
audience alone are well known, and effective use is made of the voice
from the air or behind the scene, as in the Abhiṣekanāṭaka, when Rāvaṇa
taunts his prisoner and asks, who can set her free when her rescuers
are dead; the voice replies, ‘Rāma, Rāma’. [209]
There are unquestionably primitive traits in Bhāsa’s art; he uses with
dangerous freedom the device by which some one departs and returns
straightway, to narrate what must have taken long to happen; thus in
the Abhiṣekanāṭaka, Çan̄kukarṇa is bidden send a thousand men against
Hanumant; he departs at once, to return and tell that they have fallen.
Free use is made also, as in the epic, of magic weapons in the
conflict, as in the battle of Duryodhana and Kṛṣṇa in the Dūtavākya. So
also in the Madhyamavyāyoga we find Ghaṭotkaca employing his magic
power to produce water from a rock; then he binds Bhīma in a magic
noose, from which he is delivered by a magic formula. In the Dūtavākya
the discus of Kṛṣṇa secures water from the heavenly Ganges by magic
means; it has the power to move the mountains of the gods, to set the
ocean in motion, and to bring down the stars to earth, ideas which are
less unintelligible when we remember the wide-spread Indian beliefs in
the powers of magicians, which we find later in Harṣa’s Ratnāvalī, and
which are earlier recorded of those who have attained high degrees of
intuition in both the Upaniṣads and Buddhism. In the Avimāraka we have
the magic ring of the Vidyādhara playing a decisive part in the action,
since by its use the hero can enter unseen the harem and visit his wife
Kuran̄gī in secret. It is clear that both in the epic and in the popular
tale Bhāsa found adequate precedent for the stress laid on these means
of evoking in his audience the sentiment of wonder.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account