The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
The dominating influence on Bhāsa’s style was clearly that of the epic
and in special of Vālmīki, whose great work inevitably impressed itself
on the minds of all his successors. The effects are visible not merely
in the dramas with epic subject-matter, but extend throughout Bhāsa’s
plays. The results of this influence are all to the good; the
necessities of the drama saved Bhāsa from the one great defect of the
epic style, the lack of measure, which permits the Rāmāyaṇa to
illustrate by twenty-nine similes the sorrows of Sītā in her captivity,
while in the Abhiṣekanāṭaka the dramatist is content with one. On the
other hand he owes to it the relative simplicity of his diction, and
his freedom from the excesses of the poetic equivalent of the nominal
style, which comes to dominate later Sanskrit literature. The use of
long compounds is obviously and plainly undramatic; carried to excess
it must have rendered a Sanskrit drama unintelligible even to a highly
cultivated audience as far as the verses were concerned, and it is an
essential dramatic merit in Bhāsa that his expression is far easier to
follow than in much of later dramatic poetry. He possesses in fact that
clearness, which is theoretically a merit of the Kāvya style, but which
is signally neglected by the average Kāvya writer in his anxiety to
display the complete familiarity which he possesses with every side of
the art of poetry. As far as we can judge from the scanty fragments of
Açvaghoṣa’s dramas, that poet was more complex than Bhāsa, and
certainly so in his epics, which aided powerfully in the formation of
Kālidāsa’s epic and dramatic style.
Bhāsa, of course, is not in the slightest degree akin to a poet of the
people; he is an accomplished master of the art of poetry, but one
whose good sense and taste preserve him from adopting in drama the
artifices which are permitted in the court epic and lyric which were
intended to be studied at leisure. The simple and sententious is
beloved of Bhāsa: thus Karṇa repels the objections of Çalya to his
parting with armour and earring to the disguised Indra: [213]
çikṣā kṣayaṁ gacchati kālaparyayāt: subaddhamūlā nipatanti pādapāḥ
jalaṁ jalasthānagataṁ ca çuṣyati: hutaṁ ca dattaṁ ca tathaiva
tiṣṭhati.
‘Learning decayeth with the passing of time; though firm their roots,
trees fall; the water of a lake drieth up; but sacrifices and gifts
endure.’ When Sītā is forced to undergo the ordeal by fire Lakṣmaṇa
exclaims: [214]
vijñāya devyāç çaucaṁ ca çrutvācāryasya çāsanam
dharmasnehāntare nyastā buddhir dolāyate mama.
‘I know the queen’s chastity; I have heard the bidding of our
preceptor; like a swing, my mind doth move ’twixt duty and love.’ When
Rāma falls at his father’s feet on the order being given for his
coronation, he tells us: [215]
samaṁ bāṣpeṇa patatā tasyopari mamāpy adhaḥ
pitur me kleditau pādau mamāpi kleditaṁ çiraḥ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account