The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
The harmony and melody of Bhāsa’s style, added to its purity and
perspicuity, have no better proof than the imitations of his verses
which are unquestionably to be traced in Kālidāsa, who attests thus his
practical appreciation of the merits of the dramatist, with whose
established fame his nascent genius had to contend.
6. THE LANGUAGE OF THE PLAYS
Bhāsa’s Sanskrit [236] is in the main correct according to the rules of
the grammarians, but his dependence on the epic is revealed by the
occasional use of epic irregularities, almost always for the sake of
the metre, which in the epic also is the cause of many deviations from
classical grammar. We have thus the irregular contractions putreti and
Avantyādhipateḥ, and a number of middle forms in lieu of active,
gamiṣye, garjase, drakṣyate, pṛcchase, bhraçyate, ruhyate, çroṣyate. In
other cases the active replaces the middle, āpṛccha, upalapsyati,
pariṣvaja. There is confusion between the simple and the causative verb
in sravati and vījanti, and in vimoktukāma. The forms rudantī and gṛhya
have many epic parallels. Irregular compounds are sarvarājñaḥ in verse,
and Kāçirājñe in prose; vyūḍhoras and tulyadharma occur in verse. The
use in one clause of both ced and yadi is found in verse and also in
prose, as in the epic. Mere blunders perhaps may be styled pratyāyati,
a haplological form of the causative with the meaning of the simple
verb, samāçvāsitum with causative sense, and yudh as a masculine noun.
There are other seeming irregularities, but they are either sanctioned
by usage or possible of explanation by reference to variant
interpretations of Pāṇini’s rules.
The Prākrits [237] found in Bhāsa are normally Çaurasenī, which is
present in all the plays save the Dūtavākya, which has no Prākrit;
Māgadhī found in two different forms; and what may be styled
Ardha-Māgadhī. The distinctive feature of his language is its
transitional aspect as compared with Açvaghoṣa on the one hand and
Kālidāsa on the other. Açvaghoṣa never softens—save in one
instance—hard consonants, but both ṭ and t are changed to ḍ and d in
Bhāsa. Açvaghoṣa never omits consonants, but, though this is less often
carried out than in Kālidāsa, we find cases of the loss of k, g, c, j,
t, d, p, b, v, and y when intervocalic. y itself suffers frequent
change to j, contrary to Açvaghoṣa’s usage. The change of n initial and
medial to ṇ is regular, while it is unknown to Açvaghoṣa. The aspirates
kh, gh, th, dh, ph, and bh are all often reduced as later to h, but
never in Açvaghoṣa.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account