The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
Even in war the general had not at first the power of punishing the
freeman. The very urgencies of military discipline were subordinated
to the divine authority of the priests. “Duces exemplo potius quam
imperio, si prompti, si conspicui, si ante aciem agant, admiratione
praesunt. Ceterum neque animadvertere, neque vincire, ne verberare
quidem nisi sacerdotibus permissum; non quasi in poenam, nec ducis
jussu, sed velut deo imperante, quem adesse bellantibus credunt.” Tac.
Germ. vii.
-----
How then is it to be determined to whom such power, once admitted to be
necessary, shall be at first entrusted? The first claim clearly lies
with those who are believed to be descended from the gods, or from the
local god of each particular district[224]. They are his especial care,
his children; he led them into the land, and gave them the secret of
appeasing or pleasing him: he protects them by his power, and guides
them by his revelations: he is their family and household god, the
progenitor of their race, one of themselves; and they are the best,
indeed the only, expounders of his will. A single family, with which
others have by slow degrees united themselves, by which others have been
adopted, and which in process of time have thus become the nucleus of a
state, will probably remain in possession of this sacerdotal power; the
god of the land does not readily give place to others, and those with
whom his worship identifies him will continue to be his priests long
after others have joined in their ceremonies. Or it is possible that a
single household wandering from a more civilized community may be
admitted among a rude people, to whom they impart more perfect methods
of tillage, more efficient medical precepts, more impartial maxims of
law, better or more ornamental modes of architecture, or more accurate
computations of time, than they had previously possessed: the mysterious
courses of the stars, the secrets of building bridges[225], towers and
ships, of ploughing and of sowing, of music and of healing, have been
committed to them by their god: for the sake of the benefits they offer,
their god is received into the community; and they remain his priests
because they alone are cognizant of, and can conduct, the rites
wherewith he is to be served.
-----
Footnote 224:
“Diis genitos sacrosque reges.” Tac. Orat. 12.
Footnote 225:
It is a curious fact that _Pontifex_, literally the _bridge-maker_,
should be the generic Latin name for a priest. At Athens there was a
_gens_ of γεφυραίοι: were these ever a sacerdotal tribe?
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account