Detective and mystery stories; London (England) -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
"What is it?" she asked nervously. "Oh! what is it?" Her nerves were
slack, poor girl, from the anxieties of the last week.
Jarman did not answer directly. That he should have stumbled on the
word "Tamaroo" in this unexpected manner, immediately after telling
his story to Frank, surprised him not a little. The coincidence was
extraordinary, and, he suspected, providential. He could not see what
connection there could be between the murder of Anchor in San
Francisco and that of Walter Starth in Sand Lane, but the mysterious
word "Tamaroo" seemed to link the two. Perhaps it might prove the clue
to the mystery of the last crime. Jarman sat down to hurriedly arrange
his thoughts, but he was unable to answer Mildred for a time. After
her exclamation she remained quiet, clasping and unclasping her hands,
shaken to the core of her soul by the disturbed looks of this
ordinarily phlegmatic man.
"I don't know what it means," confessed Jarman finally, and looked
again at the paper. "This is written by an uneducated person, and by
one who knows Lancaster well enough to address him by his Christian
name. Who slipped it into your hand?"
"I don't know," said Mildred again. "I was passing out with the crowd
after the verdict had been given, and I felt this being pushed into my
hand. My fingers closed on it mechanically. For the moment I never
thought to look round for the person. When I examined it outside it
was, of course, too late."
"H'm! That's a pity. If we could only find who wrote it there might be
some chance of clearing up the mystery."
"Then you think there _is_ a mystery, Mr. Jarman?"
"About your brother's death? Certainly I do. I know Lancaster very
well. Indeed, it was I who introduced him to your brother, and I am
absolutely certain that he is not the man to commit so brutal a
crime."
"But his threats on the previous night?" objected Mildred.
"Mere foolish speaking. And, far from proving his guilt, they, to my
mind, hint at his innocence. Had he intended to kill your brother he
would have been more circumspect in his language."
"But if Mr. Lancaster is innocent, why did he run away?"
Jarman shrugged his shoulders. "You can't expect a man to have all his
wits about him at such a moment. He was"--here Jarman was about to
explain the drugging, but on second thoughts he did not think it wise
to appear to know too much--"he was in the house alone with your
brother, whom he had threatened," he continued, "and when the murder
took place saw that there was every chance of his being accused. To
avoid being arrested on circumstantial evidence, he fled."
"Have you any idea where he is?" asked Miss Starth, quickly.
"No," replied Jarman, deliberately. "I have not seen Frank Lancaster
for some months. He was always in town, and, as you know, I rarely go
up. You believe him to be guilty?"
"Everything seems to point to his guilt."
"I admit that. But I am convinced from what I know of him that he is
perfectly innocent."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account