By the fact of inheritance life becomes a rhythmic phenomenon, that is
to say, a phenomenon, or better, a chain of phenomena, whose single
links reappear at constant intervals, if the outer conditions are not
changed.
THE MATERIAL CONTINUITY IN INHERITANCE
It was first stated by Gustav Jaeger and afterwards worked out into
a regular theory by Weismann, that there is a continuity of material
underlying inheritance. Taken in its literal meaning this statement is
obviously self-evident, though none the less important on that account.
For as all life is manifested on bodies, that is on matter, and as the
development of all offspring starts from parts of the parent bodies,
that is from the matter or material of the parents, it follows that in
some sense there is a sort of continuity of material as long as there is
life--at least in the forms we know of. The theory of the continuity of
“germ-plasm” therefore would be true, even if germ-cells were produced
by any and every part of the organism. That, as we know, is not actually
the case: germ-cells, at least in the higher animals and in plants, are
produced at certain specific localities of the organism only, and it is
with regard to this fact that the so-called theory of the “continuity of
germ-plasm” acquires its narrower and proper sense. There are distinct
and specific lines of cell-lineage in ontogenesis, so the theory states,
along which the continuity of germ-protoplasm is kept up, which, in
other words, lead from one egg to the other, whilst almost all other
lines of cell-lineage end in “somatic” cells, which are doomed to
death. What has been stated here is a fact in many cases of descriptive
embryology, though it can hardly be said to be more than that. We know
already, from our analytical and experimental study of morphogenesis,
that Weismann himself had to add a number of subsidiary hypotheses to
his original theory to account for the mere facts of regeneration proper
and the so-called vegetative reproduction in plants and in some animals,
and we have learned that newly discovered facts necessitate still more
appendixes to the original theory. In spite of that, I regard it as
very important that the fact of the continuity of some material as one
of the foundations of inheritance has clearly been stated, even if the
specialised form of the theory, as advocated by Weismann in the doctrine
of the “germ-lineages” (“Keimbahnen”) should prove unable to stand
against the facts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account