The Science of Fingerprints: Classification and Uses — John Shaqi
The Science of Fingerprints: Classification and UsesUnited States. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Science
The Science of Fingerprints: Classification and Uses
United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Fingerprints
[Illustration: 246]
[Illustration: 247]
[Illustration: 248]
Figures 245 to 254 have two deltas and one or more recurves, but they
are classified as loops because each recurve is spoiled by an
appendage connected to it at the point crossed by the line of flow.
[Illustration: 249]
[Illustration: 250]
[Illustration: 251]
[Illustration: 252]
[Illustration: 253]
[Illustration: 254]
_Double loop_
Within the whorl group, the subclassification type "double loop" is
used for extension purposes only. In general classification it is
designated by the letter "W".
_The double loop consists of two separate loop formations, with two
separate and distinct sets of shoulders, and two deltas._
The word "separate," as used here, does not mean unconnected. The two
loops may be connected by an appending ridge provided that it does not
abut at right angles between the shoulders of the loop formation. The
appendage rule for the loop applies also to the double loop. An
appendage abutting upon a loop at right angles between the shoulders
is considered to spoil the loop, while an appendage which flows off
smoothly is considered to leave the recurve intact.
The fact that there must be two separate loop formations eliminates
from consideration as a double loop the "S" type core, the
interlocking type core, and the formation with one loop inside
another.
The loops of a double loop do not have to conform to the requirements
of the loop. In other words, no ridge count is necessary.
It is not essential that both sides of a loop be of equal length, nor
that the two loops be of the same size. Neither is it material from
which side the loops enter.
The distinction between twinned loops and lateral pocket loops made by
Henry and adopted by other authors has been abandoned by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation because of the difficulty in locating and
tracing the loops. Both types have been consolidated under the
classification "double loop."
Figures 255 to 266 are double loops.
[Illustration: 255]
[Illustration: 256]
[Illustration: 257]
[Illustration: 258]
[Illustration: 259]
[Illustration: 260]
[Illustration: 261]
[Illustration: 262]
[Illustration: 263]
[Illustration: 264]
[Illustration: 265]
[Illustration: 266]
Figure 267 is a plain whorl. It is not classified as a double loop as
one side of one loop forms the side of the other. Figure 268 is a
plain loop. It is not a double loop because all of the recurves of the
loop on the right are spoiled by appendages.
[Illustration: 267]
[Illustration: 268]
_Accidental_
Within the whorl group the subdivision type "accidental" is used for
extension purposes only. In general classification it is designated by
the letter "W" and for extension purposes by the letter "X".
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account