The Science of the StarsMaunder, E. Walter (Edward Walter)
History
The Science of the Stars
Maunder, E. Walter (Edward Walter)
Astronomy
The astronomer who dealt with this difficulty was HIPPARCHUS (about
190-120 B.C.), who was born at Nicæa, in Bithynia, but made most of his
astronomical observations in Rhodes. He attempted to explain these
irregularities in the motions of the Sun and Moon by supposing that
though they really moved uniformly in their orbits, yet the centre of
their orbits was not the centre of the Earth, but was situated a little
distance from it. This point was called "+the excentric+," and the
line from the excentric to the Earth was called "+the line of apsides+."
But when he tried to deal with the movements of the planets, he found
that there were not enough good observations available for him to build
up any satisfactory theory. He therefore devoted himself to the work
of making systematic determinations of the places of the planets that
he might put his successors in a better position to deal with the
problem than he was. His great successor was CLAUDIUS PTOLEMY of {25}
Alexandria, who carried the work of astronomical observation from about
A.D. 127 to 150. He was, however, much greater as a mathematician than
as an observer, and he worked out a very elaborate scheme, by which he
was able to represent the motions of the planets with considerable
accuracy. The system was an extremely complex one, but its principle
may be represented as follows: If we suppose that a planet is moving
round the Earth in a circle at a uniform rate, and we tried to compute
the place of the planet on this assumption for regular intervals of
time, we should find that the planet gradually got further and further
away from the predicted place. Then after a certain time the error
would reach a maximum, and begin to diminish, until the error vanished
and the planet was in the predicted place at the proper time. The
error would then begin to fall in the opposite direction, and would
increase as before to a maximum, subsequently diminishing again to
zero. This state of things might be met by supposing that the planet
was not itself carried by the circle round the earth, but by an
+epicycle+--_i.e._ a circle travelling upon the first circle--and by
judiciously choosing the size of the epicycle and the time of
revolution the bulk of the errors in the planet's place might be
represented. But still there would be smaller errors going through
their own period, and these, again, would have to be met by imagining
that the first epicycle carried a second, and it might be that the
second carried a third, and so on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account