The Science of the StarsMaunder, E. Walter (Edward Walter)
History
The Science of the Stars
Maunder, E. Walter (Edward Walter)
Astronomy
The chief advocate of this theory is LOWELL, an American observer, who
has given very great attention {64} to the study of the planet during
the last seventeen years. His argument is that the straight lines, the
canals, which he sees on the planet, and the round dots, the "+oases+,"
which he finds at their intersections, form a system so obviously
_un_natural, that it must be the work of design--of intelligent beings.
The canals are to him absolutely regular and straight, like lines drawn
with ruler and pen-and-ink, and the oases are exactly round. But, on
the one hand, the best observers, armed with the most powerful
telescopes, have often been able to perceive that markings were really
full of irregular detail, which Lowell has represented as mere hard
straight lines and circular dots, and, on the other hand, the straight
line and the round dot are the two geometric forms which all very
minute objects must approach in appearance. That we cannot see
irregularities in very small and distant objects is no proof at all
that irregularities do not exist in them, and it has often happened
that a marking which appeared a typical "canal" when Mars was at a
great distance lost that appearance when the planet was nearer.
Astronomers, therefore, are almost unanimous that there is no reason
for supposing that any of the details that we see on the surface of
Mars are artificial in their origin. And indeed the numerical facts
that we know about the planet render it almost impossible that there
should be any life upon it.
If we turn to the table, we see that in size, volume, density, and
force of gravity at its surface, Mars lies between the Moon and the
Earth, but is nearer the Moon. This has an important bearing as to the
question of the planet's atmosphere. On the Earth we pass through half
the atmosphere by ascending a mountain {65} that is three and a third
miles in height; on Mars we should have to ascend nearly nine miles.
If the atmospheric pressure at the surface of Mars were as great as it
is at the surface of the Earth, his atmosphere would be far deeper than
ours and would veil the planet more effectively. But we see the
surface of Mars with remarkable distinctness, almost as clearly, when
its greater distance is allowed for, as we see the Moon. It is
therefore accepted that the atmospheric pressure at the surface of Mars
must be very slight, probably much less than at the top of our very
highest mountains, where there is eternal snow, and life is completely
absent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account