Christian fiction; Neighborhoods -- Scotland -- Fiction
Was it from observation of nature in its association with human nature,
or from artistic feeling alone, that Shakspere so often represents
Nature’s mood as in harmony with the mood of the principal actors in
his drama? I know I have so often found Nature’s mood in harmony with my
own, even when she had nothing to do with forming mine, that in
looking back I have wondered at the fact. There may, however, be some
self-deception about it. At all events, on the morning of my Constance’s
eighteenth birthday, a lovely October day with a golden east, clouds of
golden foliage about the ways, and an air that seemed filled with the
ether of an _aurum potabile_, there came yet an occasional blast of
wind, which, without being absolutely cold, smelt of winter, and made
one draw one’s shoulders together with the sense of an unfriendly
presence. I do not think Constance felt it at all, however, as she stood
on the steps in her riding-habit, waiting till the horses made their
appearance. It had somehow grown into a custom with us that each of the
children, as his or her birthday came round, should be king or queen
for that day, and, subject to the veto of father and mother, should have
everything his or her own way. Let me say for them, however, that in the
matter of choosing the dinner, which of course was included in the royal
prerogative, I came to see that it was almost invariably the favourite
dishes of others of the family that were chosen, and not those
especially agreeable to the royal palate. Members of families where
children have not been taught from their earliest years that the great
privilege of possession is the right to bestow, may regard this as an
improbable assertion; but others will know that it might well enough
be true, even if I did not say that so it was. But there was always
the choice of some individual treat, which was determined solely by the
preference of the individual in authority. Constance had chosen “a long
ride with papa.”
I suppose a parent may sometimes be right when he speaks with admiration
of his own children. The probability of his being correct is to be
determined by the amount of capacity he has for admiring other people’s
children. However this may be in my own case, I venture to assert that
Constance did look very lovely that morning. She was fresh as the young
day: we were early people--breakfast and prayers were over, and it was
nine o’clock as she stood on the steps and I approached her from the
lawn.
“O, papa! isn’t it jolly?” she said merrily.
“Very jolly indeed, my dear,” I answered, delighted to hear the word
from the lips of my gentle daughter. She very seldom used a slang word,
and when she did, she used it like a lady. Shall I tell you what she was
like? Ah! you could not see her as I saw her that morning if I did. I
will, however, try to give you a general idea, just in order that you
and I should not be picturing to ourselves two very different persons
while I speak of her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account