The Second Thoughts of an Idle FellowJerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
General
The Second Thoughts of an Idle Fellow
Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
English essays; English wit and humor
Have we not forgotten the meaning of the word “virtue”? Once it stood
for the good that was in a man, irrespective of the evil that might lie
there also, as tares among the wheat. We have abolished virtue, and for
it substituted virtues. Not the hero—he was too full of faults—but the
blameless valet; not the man who does any good, but the man who has not
been found out in any evil, is our modern ideal. The most virtuous thing
in nature, according to this new theory, should be the oyster. He is
always at home, and always sober. He is not noisy. He gives no trouble
to the police. I cannot think of a single one of the Ten Commandments
that he ever breaks. He never enjoys himself, and he never, so long as
he lives, gives a moment’s pleasure to any other living thing.
I can imagine the oyster lecturing a lion on the subject of morality.
“You never hear me,” the oyster might say, “howling round camps and
villages, making night hideous, frightening quiet folk out of their
lives. Why don’t you go to bed early, as I do? I never prowl round the
oyster-bed, fighting other gentlemen oysters, making love to lady oysters
already married. I never kill antelopes or missionaries. Why can’t you
live as I do on salt water and germs, or whatever it is that I do live
on? Why don’t you try to be more like me?”
An oyster has no evil passions, therefore we say he is a virtuous fish.
We never ask ourselves—“Has he any good passions?” A lion’s behaviour is
often such as no just man could condone. Has he not his good points
also?
Will the fat, sleek, “virtuous” man be as Welcome at the gate of heaven
as he supposes?
“Well,” St. Peter may say to him, opening the door a little way and
looking him up and down, “what is it now?”
“It’s me,” the virtuous man will reply, with an oily, self-satisfied
smile; “I should say, I—I’ve come.”
“Yes, I see you have come; but what is your claim to admittance? What
have you done with your three score years and ten?”
“Done!” the virtuous man will answer, “I have done nothing, I assure
you.”
“Nothing!”
“Nothing; that is my strong point; that is why I am here. I have never
done any wrong.”
“And what good have you done?”
“What good!”
“Aye, what good? Do not you even know the meaning of the word? What
human creature is the better for your having eaten and drunk and slept
these years? You have done no harm—no harm to yourself. Perhaps, if you
had you might have done some good with it; the two are generally to be
found together down below, I remember. What good have you done that you
should enter here? This is no mummy chamber; this is the place of men
and women who have lived, who have wrought good—and evil also, alas!—for
the sinners who fight for the right, not the righteous who run with their
souls from the fight.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account