The secret commonwealth of elves, fauns & fairiesKirk, Robert
Science
The secret commonwealth of elves, fauns & fairies
Kirk, Robert
Clairvoyance; Fairies; Parapsychology
In Mr. Kirk’s book we meet “the invisible Wights which haunt Houses,
... throw great Stones, Pieces of Earth and Wood at the Inhabitants,”
but “hurt them not at all.” As we have said, Major (1518) calls
these wights “Fauni or Brobne”—that is, Brownies—and says that they
thrash as much grain in one night as twenty men could do, and throw
stones about. The legend of their working was common in Scotland,
and a correspondent says that in Devonshire the belief in Pixies who
set the house in order exists among the grand-parents of the present
generation. But the sportive is more common than the kindly aspect
of Brownies. Through history we constantly find them causing objects
to move without visible contact, and “acting in sport, like Buffoons
and Drolls.” In his _Letters on Demonology_ (p. 377) Scott gives
instances where the buffoon or droll was detected, and confessed
that the rattlings of plates and movements of objects were caused
by an apparatus of threads or horse-hair. He also quotes the famous
doings of “The Just Devil of Woodstock” in 1649, which so perplexed
and discomfited the Cromwellian Commissioners. He accounts for those
annoyances by the confessions of Joe Collins of Oxford, “Funny Joe,”
which he quotes from Hone’s _Every-Day Book_, while Hone quotes
from the _British Magazine_ of 1747. But the writer in the _British
Magazine_ gives no references or authorities for the authenticity
of Funny Joe’s confessions, nor even for the existence of Joseph.
Scott could not find his original in the pamphlets of the British
Museum, and some of the statements attributed to Joe do not tally
with the official account, and other contemporary documents collected
in Sir Walter’s _Woodstock_. Joe pretends, for example, to have been
secretary to the Commission under the name of Giles Sharpe; but in
the other accounts the secretary is named Browne. A Royalist Brownie
or Polter-geist lies under shrewd suspicion, but Joe’s own existence
is unproved, and his alleged evidence is of no value. However, no
sane person can dream of doubting that many a Brownie has been as
much in flesh and blood as the Brownie of Bodsbeck in Hogg’s story.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account