The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
The radical unity of the ultimate essence of each constituent part of
compounds in Nature—from star to mineral atom, from the highest Dhyân
Chohan to the smallest infusorium, in the fullest acceptation of the term,
and whether applied to the spiritual, intellectual, or physical
worlds—this unity is the one fundamental law in Occult Science. “The Deity
is boundless and infinite expansion,” says an Occult axiom: hence, the
name of Brahmâ, as previously remarked.(218)
There is a deep philosophy underlying the earliest worship in the world,
the worship of the Sun and of Fire. Of all the Elements known to Physical
Science, Fire is that which has ever eluded definite analysis. It is
confidently asserted that air is a mixture containing the gases oxygen and
nitrogen. We view the Universe and the Earth as matter composed of
definite chemical molecules. We speak of the primitive ten earths,
endowing each with a Greek or Latin name. We say that water is,
chemically, a compound of oxygen and hydrogen. But what is Fire? It is the
effect of combustion, we are gravely answered. It is heat and light and
motion, and a correlation of physical and chemical forces in general. And
this scientific definition is philosophically supplemented by a
theological one in Webster’s Dictionary, which explains fire as “the
instrument of punishment, or the punishment of the impenitent in another
state”—the “state,” by the bye, being supposed to be spiritual; but, alas!
the presence of fire would seem to be a convincing proof of its material
nature. Yet, speaking of the illusion of regarding phenomena as simple,
because they are familiar, Professor Bain says:
Very familiar facts seem to stand in no need of explanation
themselves and to be the means of explaining whatever can be
assimilated to them. Thus, the boiling and evaporation of a liquid
is supposed to be a very simple phenomenon requiring no
explanation, and a satisfactory explanation of rarer phenomena.
That water should dry up is, to the uninstructed mind, a thing
wholly intelligible: whereas to the man acquainted with physical
science the liquid state is anomalous and inexplicable. The
lighting of a fire by a flame is a _great scientific difficulty_,
yet few people think so.(219)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account