The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
22. THEN THE SECOND EVOLVED THE EGG‐BORN, THE THIRD.(305) THE SWEAT GREW,
ITS DROPS GREW, AND THE DROPS BECAME HARD AND ROUND. THE SUN WARMED IT;
THE MOON COOLED AND SHAPED IT; THE WIND FED IT UNTIL ITS RIPENESS. THE
WHITE SWAN FROM THE STARRY VAULT(306) OVERSHADOWED THE BIG DROP. THE EGG
OF THE FUTURE RACE, THE MAN‐SWAN(307) OF THE LATER THIRD (_A_). FIRST
MALE‐FEMALE, THEN MAN AND WOMAN (_B_).
(_a_) The text of the Stanza clearly implies that the human embryo was
nourished _ab extra_ by Cosmic Forces, and that the “Father‐Mother”
furnished apparently the germ that ripened; in all probability a “sweat‐
born egg,” to be hatched out, in some mysterious way, disconnected from
the “double” parent. It is comparatively easy to conceive of an oviparous
humanity, since even now man is, in one sense, “egg‐born.” Magendie,
moreover, in his _Precis Élémentaire de Physiologie_, citing
A case where the umbilical cord was ruptured and perfectly
cicatrized,
yet the infant was born alive, pertinently asks:
How was the circulation carried on in this organ?
On the next page he says:
Nothing is at present known respecting the use of digestion in the
fœtus.
And respecting its nutrition, he propounds this query:
What, then, can we say of the nutrition of the fœtus?
Physiological works contain only _vague conjectures_ on this
point.
“Ah, but,” the sceptic may urge, “Magendie’s book belongs to the last
generation, and Science has since made such strides that his stigma of
ignorance can no longer be fixed upon the profession.” Indeed; then let us
turn to a very great authority upon Physiology, viz., Sir Michael Foster,
and, to the disadvantage of Modern Science, we shall find him saying:
Concerning the rise and development of the functional activities
of the embryo, our knowledge is almost a blank. We know scarcely
anything about the various steps by which the primary fundamental
qualities of the protoplasm of the ovum are differentiated into
the complex phenomena which we have attempted in this book to
explain.(308)
The students of Trin. Coll. Cantab, will now kindly draw a veil before the
statue of Hygieia and bandage the eyes of the busts of Galen and
Hippocrates, lest they look reproachfully at their degenerate descendants.
One further fact we must note. Sir Michael Foster is discreetly silent
about the case of the ruptured umbilical cord cited by his great French
_confrère_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account