The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Besides this, the great Teachers who professed the so‐called “false
Gnosis” were very numerous in the days of the Apostles, and were as great
as any converted Rabbi could be. If Porphyry, the Jew Malek, went against
Theurgy on account of old traditional recollections, there were other
teachers who practised it. Plotinus, Iamblichus, Proclus were all
thaumaturgists, and the latter
Elaborated the entire theosophy and theurgy of his predecessors
into a complete system. (558)
As to Ammonius,
Countenanced by Clemens and Athenagoras, in the Church, and by
learned men of the Synagogue, the Academy, and the Grove, he
fulfilled his labour by teaching a common doctrine for all.(559)
Thus it is not Judaism and Christianity that re‐modelled the ancient Pagan
Wisdom, but rather the latter that put its heathen curb, quietly and
insensibly, on the new faith; and this, moreover, was still further
influenced by the Eclectic Theosophical system, the direct emanation of
the Wisdom Religion. All that is grand and noble in Christian theology
comes from Neo‐Platonism. It is too well‐known to now need much repetition
that Ammonius Saccas, the God‐taught (_theodidaktos_) and the lover of the
truth (_philalethes_), in establishing his school, made a direct attempt
to benefit the world by teaching those portions of the Secret Science that
were permitted by its direct guardians to be revealed in those days.(560)
The modern movement of our own Theosophical Society was begun on the same
principles; for the Neo‐Platonic school of Ammonius aimed, as we do, at
the reconcilement of all sects and peoples, under the once common faith of
the Golden Age, trying to induce the nations to lay aside their
contentions—in religious matters at any rate—by proving to them that their
various beliefs are all the more or less legitimate children of one common
parent, the Wisdom Religion.
Nor was the Eclectic Theosophical system—as some writers inspired by Rome
would make the world believe—developed only during the third century of
our era; but it belongs to a much earlier age, as has been shown by
Diogenes Laertius. He traces it to the beginning of the dynasty of the
Ptolemies; to the great seer and prophet, the Egyptian Priest Pot‐Amun, of
the temple of the God of that name—for Amun is the God of Wisdom. Unto
that day the communication between the Adepts of Upper India and Bactria
and the Philosophers of the West had never ceased.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account