The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
It would thus amount _to a gross mistake to see merely errors_ in
the Angelology of the Kabalists and Gnostics, so severely treated
by the Apostle of the Gentiles, for his imposing censure reached
_only their exaggerations and vicious interpretations_, and still
more, _the application of those noble_ titles _to the miserable
personalities of demoniacal usurpers_.(619) Often nothing so
resemble each other as _the language of the judges and that of the
convicts_ [of saints and Occultists]. One has to penetrate deeply
into this _dual_ study [of creed and profession] and what is still
better, _to trust blindly to the authority of the tribunal_ [the
Church of Rome, of course] to enable oneself to seize precisely
the point of the error. The _Gnosis_ condemned by St. Paul
remains, nevertheless, for him as for Plato the supreme knowledge
of all truths, and of the _Being par excellence_, ὁ ὄντως ὤν
(_Republ._ Bk. VI). The Ideas, _types_, ἀρχὰι of the Greek
philosopher, the _Intelligences_ of Pythagoras, the _aeons_ or
_emanations_, the occasion of so much reproach to the first
heretics, the Logos or Word, Chief of these Intelligences, the
_Demiurgos_, the architect of the world under his father’s
direction [of the Pagans], the unknown God, the _En‐soph_, or the
_It of the Infinite_ [of the Kabalists], the angelical
periods,(620) the _seven_ spirits, the Depths of _Ahriman_, the
World’s _Rectors_, the _Archontes_ of the air, the _God of this
world_, the _pleroma_ of the intelligences, down to _Metatron_ the
angel of the Jews, _all this is found word for word, as so many
truths, in the works of our greatest doctors, and in St.
Paul_.(621)
If an Occultist, eager to charge the Church with a numberless series of
plagiarisms were to write the above, could he have written more strongly?
And have we, or have we not, the right, after such a complete confession,
to reverse the tables and to say of Roman Catholics and others what is
said of the Gnostics and Occultists. “They used our expressions and
rejected our doctrines.” For it is not the “promoters of the false
Gnosis”—who had all those expressions from their archaic ancestors—who
helped themselves to Christian expressions, but verily the Christian
Fathers and Theologians, who helped themselves to our nest, and have tried
ever since to soil it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account