The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Nothing can be further from the intention of any true Occultist—who stands
possessed, by virtue of his higher psychic development, of instruments of
research far more penetrating in their power than any as yet in the hands
of physical experimentalists—than to look unsympathetically on the efforts
that are being made in the area of physical enquiry. The exertions and
labours undertaken to solve as many as possible of the problems of Nature
have always been holy in his sight. The spirit in which Sir Isaac Newton
remarked that at the end of all his astronomical work he felt a mere child
picking up shells beside the Ocean of Knowledge, is one of reverence for
the boundlessness of Nature which Occult Philosophy itself cannot eclipse.
And it may freely be recognised that the attitude of mind which this
famous simile describes is one which fairly represents that of the great
majority of _genuine_ Scientists in regard to all the phenomena of the
physical plane of Nature. In dealing with this they are often caution and
moderation itself. They observe facts with a patience that cannot be
surpassed. They are slow to cast these into theories, with a prudence that
cannot be too highly commended. And, subject to the limitations under
which they observe Nature, they are beautifully accurate in the record of
their observations. Moreover, it may be conceded further that modern
Scientists are exceedingly careful not to affirm negations. They may say
it is immensely improbable that any discovery will ever conflict with such
or such a theory, now supported by such and such an aggregation of
recorded facts. But even in reference to the broadest
generalizations—which pass into a dogmatic form only in brief popular text
books of scientific knowledge—the tone of “Science” itself, if that
abstraction may be held to be embodied in the persons of its most
distinguished representatives, is one of reserve and often of modesty.
Far, therefore, from being disposed to scoff at the errors into which the
limitations of their methods may betray men of Science, the true Occultist
will rather appreciate the pathos of a situation in which great industry
and thirst for truth are condemned to disappointment, and often to
confusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account