The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Roman Catholics, who are guilty of precisely the same worship, and to the
very letter—having borrowed it from the later Chaldæans, the Lebanon
Nabathæans, and the baptized Sabæans,(52) and not from the learned
Astronomers and Initiates of the days of old—would now, by anathematizing
it, hide the source from which it came. Theology and Churchianism would
fain trouble the clear fountain that fed them from the first, to prevent
posterity from looking into it, and thus seeing their original prototype.
The Occultists, however, believe the time has come to give everyone his
due. As to our other opponents—the modern sceptic and the Epicurean, the
cynic and the Sadducee—they may find an answer to their denials in our
earlier volumes. As to many unjust aspersions on the ancient doctrines,
the reason for them is given in these words in _Isis Unveiled_:
The thought of the present‐day commentator and critic as to the
ancient learning, is limited to and runs round the exoterism of
the temples; his insight is either unwilling or unable to
penetrate into the solemn adyta of old, where the hierophant
instructed the neophyte to regard the public worship in its true
light. No ancient sage would have taught that man is the king of
creation, and that the starry heaven and our mother earth were
created for his sake.(53)
When we find such works as _Phallicism_(54) appearing in our day in print,
it is easy to see that the day for concealment and travesty has passed
away. Science, in Philology, Symbolism and Comparative Religion, has
progressed too far to make wholesale denials any longer, and the Church is
too wise and cautious not to be now making the best of the situation.
Meanwhile, the “rhombs of Hecate” and the “wheels of Lucifer,”(55) daily
exhumed on the sites of Babylonia, can no longer be used as clear evidence
of a Satan‐worship, since the same symbols are shown in the ritual of the
Latin Church. The latter is too learned to be ignorant of the fact that
even the later Chaldæans, who had gradually fallen into dualism, reducing
all things to two primal Principles, never worshipped Satan or idols, any
more than did the Zoroastrians, who now lie under the same accusation, but
that their Religion was as highly philosophical as any; their dual and
exoteric Theosophy became the heirloom of the Jews, who, in their turn,
were forced to share it with the Christians. Pârsîs are to this day
charged with Heliolatry, and yet in the Chaldæan Oracles, under the
“Magical and Philosophical Precepts of Zoroaster” one finds the following:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account