The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Since these words were written, some of the “apocryphal” verses by the
“mythical” Orpheus have also been found copied word for word, in
hieroglyphics, in certain inscriptions of the Fourth Dynasty, addressed to
various Deities. Finally, Creuzer discovered and immediately pointed out
the very significant fact that numerous passages found in Homer and Hesiod
were undeniably borrowed by the two great poets from the Orphic Hymns,
thus proving the latter to be far older than the _Iliad_ or the _Odyssey_.
And so gradually the ancient claims come to be vindicated, and modern
criticism has to submit to evidence. Many are now the writers who confess
that such a type of literature as the Hermetic works of Egypt can never be
dated too far back into the prehistoric ages. The texts of many of these
ancient works, that of Enoch included, so loudly proclaimed “apocryphal”
at the beginning of this century, are now discovered and recognised in the
most secret and sacred sanctuaries of Chaldæa, India, Phœnicia, Egypt and
Central Asia. But even such proofs have failed to convince the bulk of our
Materialists. The reason for this is very simple and evident. All these
texts—held in universal veneration in Antiquity, found in the secret
libraries of all the great temples, studied (if not always mastered) by
the greatest statesmen, classical writers, philosophers, kings and laymen,
as much as by renowned Sages—what were they? Treatises on Magic and
Occultism, pure and simple; the now derided and tabooed Theosophy—hence
the ostracism.
Were people, then, so simple and credulous in the days of Pythagoras and
Plato? Were the millions of Babylonia and Egypt, of India and Greece, with
their great Sages to lead them, all fools, that during those periods of
great learning and civilization which preceded the year _one_ of our
era—the latter giving birth but to the intellectual darkness of mediæval
fanaticism—so many otherwise great men should have devoted their lives to
a mere illusion, a superstition called Magic? It would seem so, had one to
remain content with the word and conclusions of modern Philosophy.
Every Art and Science, however, whatever its intrinsic merit, has had its
discoverer and practitioner, and subsequently its proficients to teach it.
What is the origin of the Occult Sciences, or Magic? Who were its
professors, and what is known of them, whether in history or legend?
Clemens Alexandrinus, one of the most intelligent and learned of the early
Christian Fathers, answers this question in his _Stromateis_. That ex‐
pupil of the Neoplatonic School argues:
If there is instruction, you must seek for the master.(61)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account