Observe the case when an individual is an eminent person in his country,
zealous, wise, pure-hearted, known for his innate capacity, intelligence,
natural perspicacity—and is also an important member of the state: what,
for such an individual, can be regarded as honor, abiding happiness, rank
and station, whether in the here or the hereafter? Is it a diligent
attention to truth and righteousness, is it dedication and resolve and
devotion to the good pleasure of God, is it the desire to attract the
favorable consideration of the ruler and to merit the approval of the
people? Or would it, rather, consist in this, that for the sake of
indulging in feasts and dissipations by night he should undermine his
country and break the hearts of his people by day, causing his God to
reject him, and his sovereign to cast him out and his people to defame him
and hold him in deserved contempt? By God, the mouldering bones in the
graveyard are better than such as these! Of what value are they, who have
never tasted the heavenly food of truly human qualities, and never drunk
of the crystalline waters of those bounties which belong to the realm of
man?
It is unquestionable that the object in establishing parliaments is to
bring about justice and righteousness, but everything hinges on the
efforts of the elected representatives. If their intention is sincere,
desirable results and unforeseen improvements will be forthcoming; if not,
it is certain that the whole thing will be meaningless, the country will
come to a standstill and public affairs will continuously deteriorate. “I
see a thousand builders unequal to one subverter; what then of the one
builder who is followed by a thousand subverters?”
The purpose of the foregoing statements is to demonstrate at least this,
that the happiness and greatness, the rank and station, the pleasure and
peace, of an individual have never consisted in his personal wealth, but
rather in his excellent character, his high resolve, the breadth of his
learning, and his ability to solve difficult problems. How well has it
been said: “On my back is a garment which, were it sold for a penny, that
penny would be worth far more; yet within the garment is a soul which, if
you weighed it against all the souls in the world, would prove greater and
nobler.”
In the present writer’s view it would be preferable if the election of
nonpermanent members of consultative assemblies in sovereign states should
be dependent on the will and choice of the people. For elected
representatives will on this account be somewhat inclined to exercise
justice, lest their reputation suffer and they fall into disfavor with the
public.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account