The Sentence and Affidavit of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: For an Attempt to Commit an Unnatural Crime on Adam Foreman, at Vauxhall. Together With Judge Bayley's Impressive Address to the Prisoner, at Full Length. At the Court of King's Bench, Nov. 24, 1817. — John Shaqi
The Sentence and Affidavit of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: For an Attempt to Commit an Unnatural Crime on Adam Foreman, at Vauxhall. Together With Judge Bayley's Impressive Address to the Prisoner, at Full Length. At the Court of King's Bench, Nov. 24, 1817.Dowling, Joseph Augustus
History
The Sentence and Affidavit of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: For an Attempt to Commit an Unnatural Crime on Adam Foreman, at Vauxhall. Together With Judge Bayley's Impressive Address to the Prisoner, at Full Length. At the Court of King's Bench, Nov. 24, 1817.
Dowling, Joseph Augustus
Church, J. (John), approximately 1780-approximately 1825 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Sodomy) -- England
There is only one circumstance in that letter to which I will advert. He
states, that he is a child of peculiar Providence, corrected by the hand
of the Almighty, who will resent every attempt to correct his offences
from any other quarter. I do not think that your Lordship will
intimidated from administering to him a due portion of punishment for his
offence, by any such intimation as that letter holds out.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY then addressed the defendant as follows:—The painful
part of my duty is, to pass on you the sentence of this Court, for the
enormous crime of which you stand convicted. It is not only painful when
I think that you are so far advanced in years, and that you were in a
situation which it became your bounden duty to reflect on what would
become of you, as well as others, hereafter, but also when I reflect,
that when it was your duty to guide the course of others through life,
you took advantage of the confidence reposed in you, to put young people
materially off their guard, who would expect, from your sanctity of
manners, that nothing was to be feared.
Your attempt, in this instance, was upon a lad, very young, and if he had
been once drawn into the commission of that offence, which you attempted
to commit on him, though young, what must have been the consequence?
What course of life would he not be afterwards induced to follow by you?
The nature of that crime raises in all those who hear me the greatest
detestation and abhorrence—abhorrence indeed, when it is committed by a
married man, and one in that sacred situation in which you have been
(unfortunately for mankind) placed.
Your affidavit states, that, since the time of your conviction, there
have been publications reflecting on your character. The Court does not
approve of any misconduct in any one, and, however the natural
indignation of the public may be called forth by the enormities which you
have committed, the Court would of course apportion such punishment to
any parties justly complained of, as the nature of the case, under all
the circumstances, might demand. But that does not diminish your
GUILT—your GUILT stands in a very high and prominent point of view, and
it is necessary for the Court to pass on you a severe punishment.
If you have the feelings you ought to have, and if your life has not been
a life of hypocrisy throughout, you will try to obtain forgiveness for
this high offence, and reflect that it is fortunate you did not carry
your offence to its completion.
The sentence of the Court upon you is, that you be imprisoned in his
Majesty’s gaol at Newington for TWO YEARS; and at the expiration of that
term, that you find surety for your good behaviour, yourself in the sum
of 500_l._ and two sureties respectively in the sum of 100_l._ for the
term of five years, and that you be further imprisoned until such
securities are found.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account