There is in build a great deal in common between the Gurkha and
Garhwali, and confusion is natural in the uninitiated. It is not only
that both are hillmen, belong to rifle regiments, and wear slouch or
terai hats; the Garhwali is in appearance a cross between the Dogra and
the "Ghurk." He has the close-cropped hair, the "bodi" or topknot, the
hillman's face, and you will find in the veterans the same tight-drawn
lines under the eye that bespeak stiffening in a hard school and give
them a grim and warlike look. But the British officer in a Garhwali
regiment naturally resents the swallowing of the small community, with
its honour, prestige, individuality and all, by the great. The Garhwali,
he argues, has at least earned his right to a separate identity now, and
he is jealous of the overshadowing wing.
Ramadie was a great day for him. The Garhwalis did not win the battle,
but they reaped the rich field by the bridge alone. Other regiments did
splendid work that day, and the officer who showed me over the ground
was afraid that I should forget them in "booming his show." "It was just
our luck," he explained, "that we happened to be there." Most of the
90th Punjabis had side-tracked to the right to take Unjana Hill, while
the rest of the brigade swept on and cleared the Sheikh Faraja Ridge. To
gain the Aziziyah Canal the Garhwalis changed direction and bore off to
the left. Other companies came up afterwards, but when the Garhwalis
reached the bridge they were unsupported. They took the bridge, the
guns, the 2000 prisoners, the Turkish General,[9] alone. As for the
prisoners, "It was not so much a capture," the officer explained to me
modestly, "as a surrender to the nearest troops, and we happened to be
there."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account