The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the StatesFleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
History
The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the States
Fleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); United States -- History -- 1865-1898
By the use of commercial fertilizers, vast regions once considered
barren have been brought into profitable cultivation, and really afford
a more reliable and constant crop than the rich alluvial lands of the
old slave plantations. In nearly every agricultural county in the South
there is to be observed, on the one hand, this section of fertile soils,
once the heart of the old civilization, now abandoned by the whites,
held in tenantry by a dense negro population, full of dilapidation and
ruin; while on the other hand, there is the region of light, thin soils,
occupied by the small white freeholder, filled with schools, churches,
and good roads, and all the elements of a happy, enlightened country
life.
¹ The Census of 1880 gave proof of the superiority of the whites in
cotton production. For purposes of comparison the cotton area may be
divided into three regions: first, the Black Belt, in which the farmers
were black, the soil fertile, the plantations large, the credit evil at
its worst, and the yield of cotton per acre the least; second, the white
districts, where the soil was the poorest, the farms small, the workers
nearly all white, and the yield per acre better than on the fertile
Black Belt lands; third, the regions in which the races were nearly
equal in numbers or where the whites were in a slight majority, with
soil of medium fertility, good methods of agriculture, and, owing to
better controlled labor, the best yield. In other words, negroes,
fertile soil, and poor crops went together; and on the other hand the
whites got better crops on less fertile soil. The Black Belt has never
again reached the level of production it had in 1860. But the white
district kept improving slowly.
All the systems devised for handling negro labor proved to be only
partially successful. The laborer was migratory, wanted easy work, with
one or two holidays a week, and the privilege of attending political
meetings, camp meetings, and circuses. A thrifty negro could not make
headway because his fellows stole from him or his less energetic
relations and friends visited him and ate up his substance. One Alabama
planter declared that he could not raise a turkey, a chicken, a hog, or
a cow; and another asserted that "a hog has no more chance to live among
these thieving negro farmers than a June bug in a gang of puddle ducks."
Lands were mortgaged to the supply houses in the towns, the whites
gradually deserted the country, and many rice and cotton fields grew up
in weeds. Crop stealing at night became a business which no legislation
could ever completely stop.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account