The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the StatesFleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
History
The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the States
Fleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); United States -- History -- 1865-1898
The reconstructionists were not able in 1867-68 to carry through
Congress any provision for the social equality of the races, but in the
reconstructed States the equal rights issue was alive throughout the
period. Legislation giving to the negro equal rights in hotels, places
of amusements, and common carriers, was first enacted in Louisiana and
South Carolina. Frequently the carpetbaggers brought up the issue in
order to rid the radical ranks of the scalawags who were opposed to
equal rights. In Florida, for example, the carpetbaggers framed a
comprehensive Equal Rights Law, passed it, and presented it to Governor
Reed, who was known to be opposed to such legislation. He vetoed the
measure and thus lost the negro support. Intermarriage with whites was
made legal in Louisiana and South Carolina and by court decision was
permitted in Alabama and Mississippi, but the Georgia Supreme Court held
it to be illegal. Mixed marriages were few, but these were made
occasions of exultation over the whites and of consequent ill feeling.
Charles Sumner was a persistent agitator for equal rights. In 1871 he
declared in a letter to a South Carolina negro convention that the race
must insist not only upon equality in hotels and on public carriers but
also in the schools. "It is not enough," he said, "to provide separate
accommodations for colored citizens even if in all respects as good as
those of other persons.... The discrimination is an insult and a
hindrance, and a bar, which not only destroys comfort and prevents
equality, but weakens all other rights. The right to vote will have new
security when your equal right in public conveyances, hotels, and common
schools, is at last established; but here you must insist for yourselves
by speech, petition, and by vote." The Southern whites began to develop
the "Jim Crow" theory of "separate but equal" accommodations. Senator
Hill of Georgia, for example, thought that hotels might have separate
divisions for the two races, and he cited the division in the churches
as proof that the negro wanted separation.
About 1874, it was plain that the last radical Congress was nearly ready
to enact social equality legislation. This fact turned many of the
Southern Unionist class back to the Democratic party, there to remain
for a long time. In 1875, as a sort of memorial to Sumner, Congress
passed the Civil Rights Act, which gave to negroes equal rights in
hotels, places of amusement, on public carriers, and on juries. Some
Democratic leaders were willing to see such legislation enacted, because
in the first place, it would have little effect except in the Border and
Northern States, where it would turn thousands into the Democratic fold,
and in the second place, because they were sure that in time the Supreme
Court would declare the law unconstitutional. And so it happened.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account