The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the StatesFleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
History
The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the States
Fleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); United States -- History -- 1865-1898
Even these restrictions, however, might have been borne if only they had
been honestly applied. Unfortunately, some of the most spectacular
frauds ever perpetrated were carried through in connection with the
attempt of the United States Treasury Department to collect and sell the
confiscable property in the South. The property to be sold consisted of
what had been captured and seized by the army and the navy, of
"abandoned" property, as such was called whose owner was absent in the
Confederate service, and of property subject to seizure under the
confiscation acts of Congress. No captures were made after the general
surrender, and no further seizures of "abandoned" property were made
after Johnson's amnesty proclamation of May 29, 1865. This left only the
"confiscable" property to be collected and sold.
For collection purposes the States of the South were divided into
districts, each under the supervision of an agent of the Treasury
Department, who received a commission of about 25 per cent. Cotton,
regarded as the root of the slavery evil, was singled out as the
principal object of confiscation. It was known that the Confederate
Government had owned in 1865 about 150,000 bales, but the records were
defective and much of it, with no clear indication of ownership, still
remained with the producers. Secretary Chase, foreseeing the difficulty
of effecting a just settlement, counseled against seizure, but his
judgment was overruled. Secretary McCulloch said of his agents: "I am
sure I sent some honest cotton agents South; but it sometimes seems
doubtful whether any of them remained honest very long." Some of the
natives, even, became cotton thieves. In a report made in 1866,
McCulloch describes their methods:
Contractors, anxious for gain, were sometimes guilty of bad faith and
peculation, and frequently took possession of cotton and delivered it
under contracts as captured or abandoned, when in fact it was not such,
and they had no right to touch it.... Residents and others in the
districts where these peculations were going on took advantage of the
unsettled condition of the country, and representing themselves as
agents of this department, went about robbing under such pretended
authority, and thus added to the difficulties of the situation by
causing unjust opprobrium and suspicion to rest upon officers engaged in
the faithful discharge of their duties. Agents, ... frequently received
or collected property, and sent it forward which the law did not
authorize them to take.... Lawless men, singly and in organized bands,
engaged in general plunder; every species of intrigue and peculation and
theft were resorted to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account