The Serapion Brethren, Vol. I.Hoffmann, E. T. A. (Ernst Theodor Amadeus)
General
The Serapion Brethren, Vol. I.
Hoffmann, E. T. A. (Ernst Theodor Amadeus)
Fiction
"I don't mind confessing that all this day I have been unable to banish
from my recollection a certain strange adventure which I met with
several years ago; and perhaps when the voices within one are loud, the
lips are not very apt to open for speech. But I have been attending to
all that has been said, and can give a proper account of it all. In the
first place, Theodore was quite right in saying that we had been
childish in fancying that we could begin again just where we left off
twelve years ago, and were sulking with each other because this was
not, and could not be, the case. I maintain that nothing could have so
established us as Philistines incarnate as to have gone ambling along
in our old track. And this reminds me of two savants--but I must tell
this story at full length. Imagine two men--whom I shall call Sebastian
and Ptolemy--imagine to yourselves these two studying Kant's philosophy
as hard as they could at College at K----, and daily carrying on long
discussions as to various points of it. Just at the moment when
Sebastian was going to deliver his most clenching blow, and Ptolemy
pulling himself together to answer it, they were interrupted; and Fate
so arranged matters that they never met again in K----, one going off
in one direction, the other, in another. Nearly twenty years afterwards
Ptolemy saw in the streets of B----, a figure walking, whom he at once
recognised as his friend Sebastian. He rushed after him, slapped him on
the shoulder, and when he looked round, Ptolemy said: 'Then you
maintain that----'
"In short, struck the (argumentative) blow which he had lifted his arm
to deliver twenty years before! Sebastian sprung the mines which he had
laid in K----. They argued for two hours, three hours, walking up and
down the streets, and in the heat of their discussion, agreed to submit
the question to the Professor for his decision, never recollecting that
poor old Emanuel had been many a year in his grave. They parted, and
never met again. Now to _me_ there is something almost terrific about
this story (which has this peculiarity, that it is strictly true). My
imagination _boggles_ at a Philistinism of a depth so ghastly! So we
are not going to be Philistines. We are not going to insist on spinning
on at the thread which we were spinning twelve years ago, nor be
annoyed with each other for having on different hats and coats. We will
be different to what we were then, and yet the same; so that is
settled. What Lothair, without much relevancy, said of clubs is, I dare
say true enough, and proves how prone poor Humanity is to dam up the
minutest remnants of its freedom, and build an artificial roof to
prevent it looking up to the clear blue sky. But what have we to do
with this? For my part, I adhere to Ottmar's proposal, that we meet
every week on a certain day."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account