Collectivism; Economic history; Great Britain -- Economic policy; Industrial policy; Social history; Socialism
It may be objected that however true all this may be, no one can, upon such
theoretical grounds, regard the Servile State as something really
approaching us. We need not believe in its advent (we shall be told) until
we see the first effects of its action.
To this I answer that the first effects of its action are already apparent.
The Servile State is, in industrial England to-day, no longer a menace but
something in actual existence. It is in process of construction. The first
main lines of it are already plotted out; the cornerstone of it is already
laid.
To see the truth of this it is enough to consider laws and projects of law,
the first of which we already enjoy, while the last will pass from project
to positive statute in due process of time.
Appendix on "Buying-Out"
There is an impression abroad among those who propose to expropriate the
Capitalist class for the benefit of the State, but who appreciate the
difficulties in the way of direct confiscation, that by spreading the
process over a sufficient number of years and pursuing it after a certain
fashion bearing all the outward appearances of a purchase, the
expropriation could be effected without the consequences and attendant
difficulties of direct confiscation. In other words, there is an impression
that the State could "buyout" the Capitalist class without their knowing
it, and that in a sort of painless way this class can be slowly conjured
out of existence.
The impression is held in a confused fashion by most of those who cherish
it, and will not bear a clear analysis.
It is impossible by any jugglery to "buyout" the universality of the means
of production without confiscation.
To prove this, consider a concrete case which puts the problem in the
simplest terms:--
A community of twenty-two families lives upon the produce of two farms, the
property of only two families out of that twenty-two.
The remaining twenty families are Proletarian. The two families, with their
ploughs, stores, land, etc., are Capitalist.
The labour of the twenty proletarian families applied to the land and
capital of these two capitalist families produces 300 measures of wheat, of
which 200 measures, or 10 measures each, form the annual support of the
twenty proletarian families; the remaining 100 measures are the surplus
value retained as rent, interest, and profit by the two Capitalist
families, each of which has thus a yearly income of 50 measures.
The State proposes to produce, after a certain length of time, a condition
of affairs such that the surplus values shall no longer go to the two
Capitalist families, but shall be distributed to the advantage of the whole
community, while it, the State, shall itself become the unembarrassed owner
of both farms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account