The settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830 — John Shaqi
The settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830Boggess, Arthur Clinton
History
The settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830
Boggess, Arthur Clinton
Illinois -- History -- 1778-1865
ARTHUR C. BOGGESS.
Pacific University,
Forest Grove, Oregon.
September 14, 1907.
CHAPTER I. THE COUNTY OF ILLINOIS.
An Act for establishing the County of Illinois, and for the more effectual
protection and defence thereof, passed both houses of the Virginia
legislature on December 9, 1778.(1) The new county was to include the
inhabitants of Virginia, north of the Ohio River, but its location was not
more definitely prescribed.(2)
The words “for the more effectual protection and defence thereof” in the
title of the Act were thoroughly appropriate. The Indians were in almost
undisputed possession of the land in Illinois, save the inconsiderable
holdings of the French. Some grants and sales of large tracts of land had
been made. In 1769, John Wilkins, British commandant in Illinois, granted
to the trading-firm of Baynton, Wharton and Morgan, a great tract of land
lying between the Kaskaskia and the Mississippi rivers. The claim to the
land descended to John Edgar, who shared it with John Murray St. Clair,
son of Gov. Arthur St. Clair. The claim was filed for 13,986 acres, but
was found on survey to contain 23,000 acres, and was confirmed by Gov. St.
Clair. At a later examination of titles, this claim was rejected because
the grant was made in the first instance counter to the king’s
proclamation of 1763, and because the confirmation by Gov. St. Clair was
made after his authority ceased and was not signed by the Secretary of the
Northwest Territory.(3) In 1773, William Murray and others, subsequently
known as the Illinois Land Company, bought two large tracts of land in
Illinois from the Illinois Indians. In 1775, a great tract lying on both
sides of the Wabash was similarly purchased by what later became the
Wabash Land Company. The purchase of the Illinois Company was made in the
presence, but without the sanction, of the British officers, and Gen.
Thomas Gage had the Indians re-convened and the validity of the purchase
expressly denied. These large grants were illegal, and the Indians were
not in consequence disposessed of them.(4) Thus far, the Indians of the
region had been undisturbed by white occupation. British landholders were
few and the French clearings were too small to affect the hunting-grounds.
French and British alike were interested in the fur trade. A French town
was more suited to be the center of an Indian community than to become a
point on its periphery, for here the Indians came for religious
instruction, provisions, fire-arms, and fire-water. The Illinois Indian of
1778 had been degraded rather than elevated by his contact with the
whites. The observation made by an acute French woman of large experience,
although made at another time and place, was applicable here. She said
that it was much easier for a Frenchman to learn to live like an Indian
than for an Indian to learn to live like a Frenchman.(5)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account