The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
Galen gives an interesting account of bread. The best kinds, he says, are
such as contain plenty of leaven, have been properly pounded, and exposed
to a moderate heat in the oven. When exposed to too strong a heat, he
properly remarks that a crust is burned on the outside, while the inside
is left raw or improperly concocted. Unleavened bread he wholly condemns.
Celsus appears to have had a better opinion of it, for he ranks it first
among those substances which do not spoil on the stomach. Of bread, in
general, he correctly remarks, “Siquidem plus alimenti est in pane quam
in ullo alio.” Pliny and Galen describe a soft spongy kind of bread,
which would seem to have resembled that which we call buns. Pliny adds,
that some nations prepare their bread with butter. He mentions a kind of
bread called _artolagani_, which, according to Dr. Arbuthnot, answered
to our cakes. Seth gives an interesting account of bread, but it is
mostly extracted from Galen. Haly Abbas says, that the best kind of bread
is that which is made from wheaten flour and salt, and is fermented,
and heated in an oven to such a degree as not to burn the outer crust.
Rhases disapproves entirely of unleavened bread. Serapion states that
old bread is astringent. Avenzoar prefers newly-made bread, provided it
has been cooled. Hippocrates condemns the eating of bread before it has
been properly cooled. (De Diæt. i.) He mentions only two kinds of bread,
the fine and the coarse—_autopyrus_. (De Vet. Med. 14.) According to
Actuarius, the lightest kinds of wheat form the best bread for indolent
persons, but persons actively employed require the weightiest kinds.
Unleavened bread, he says, is very indigestible. Bread prepared with
oil, he adds, is very nutritious, but requires a strong stomach to
digest it. See an interesting account of the various kinds of bread in
Athenæus (Deipnos. ii, 26.) He makes the remark that the worst kind is
the most laxative. Among the kinds of bread described by ancient authors
may be noticed the _oxylipus_ mentioned by Galen (Meth. Med. viii, 5),
which, as Manardus remarks, was prepared with vinegar. Another kind,
called νάστος, was fermented with honey, dried grapes, &c. See Tzetzes
(ad Lycoph. Casan. 640.) It is to be borne in mind that the ancients
generally used _leaven_ to ferment their bread. Pliny, however, mentions
that the Gauls and Spaniards were in the practice of using _yeast_. (H.
N. xviii, 7.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account