The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. Coray correctly states in his ‘Notes on the Fragment of
Xenocrates,’ that, in the ancient classification of animals, the
ὀστρακώδη or ὀστρακόδερμα, were divided into the σκληρόστρακα, or
testacea, comprehending oysters, muscles, &c.; and the μαλακόστρακα,
or crustacea, comprehending the crabs, paguri, &c. But, as he remarks
afterwards, the σκληρόστρακα were often called by the generic term,
ὀστρακόδερμα. The ancient division of the lower classes of animals
is derived from Aristotle’s ‘History of Animals’ (iv), and with some
slight modifications it is the same as the classification adopted by
Baron Cuvier. Pliny thus distinguishes the mollusca, crustacea, and
testacea: “Piscium quidam sanguine carent, de quibus dicemus. Sunt autem
tria genera: in primis quæ mollia appellantur (_mollusca?_): deinde
contecta crustis tenuibus (_crustacea?_): postremo testis conclusa
duris (_testacea?_). Mollia sunt, loligo, sepia, polypus, et cetera
ejus generis,” &c. In another place, however, he introduces confusion
by applying the term mollia to the crustacea. This mistake probably
originated in the resemblance between the Greek terms μαλάκια and
μαλακόστρακα. (Hist. Nat. ix.)
We may mention further, that, in Oppian’s delightful poem on ‘Fishing,’
the crustacea are described at book i, l. 259, the testacea at l. 283,
and the mollusca at l. 638. On the terms used by Ælian, see ‘De Nat.
Animal.’ (ix, 6, ed. Schneider.) Athenæus gives a long disquisition on
these animals in the third book of the ‘Deipnosophistæ.’
Of the testacea described by the ancient writers on dietetics, we are
inclined to refer the chema to the genus _chema_ of modern naturalists,
comprehending several species of the cockle: the purpura to the _helix
ianthina_ or purple fish, in particular: the solen to the genus _solen_
or bag-fish: the spondylus to the genus _spondylus_ or prickly oyster:
the buccina to the _buccinum harpa_: the cochlea to the _helix pomatia_
or edible snail: the astacus to the _astacus fluviatilis_ or crawfish:
the pagurus to the _cancer pagurus_ or common crab: and the cancer to
some variety of the same: the _locusta_ to more than one species of the
_locusta_ or lobster; the squilla to the _crangon vulgaris_ Cuv. or
shrimp: and the leo marinus indefinitely to the genus _cancer_. We think
it but right, however, to confess that our own acquaintance with this
department of natural history is not so extensive as to warrant us in
speaking authoritatively on these matters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account