The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. The Father of Medicine who was profoundly skilled in
Semeiology, appears to have attached great importance to the observance
of the critical days. At first, as Galen remarks, he seems to have been
undecided respecting certain days, and, accordingly, he gives a somewhat
different list of them in his ‘Prognostics’ and ‘Aphorisms,’ from what he
has given in his ‘Epidemics.’ His latter list of critical days differs
little or nothing from that of Galen.
Galen reposes such confidence in the doctrine of critical days, that he
affirms that, by a proper observance of them, the physician may be able
to prognosticate the very hour when a fever will terminate. The following
is his list: The 7th is particularly favorable; next, the 14th; next to
these, the 9th, 11th, and 20th; then the 17th and 5th; afterwards the
4th, 3d, and 18th. The 6th is very doubtful and unfavorable; the 8th and
10th, like the 6th; the 12th, 16th, and 19th, like the 8th and 10th.
Intermediate between these two lists of favorable and unfavorable days is
the 13th. He informs us that Diocles and Archigenes held the 21st to be
particularly favorable, but he agrees with Hippocrates in rejecting it
and adopting the 20th.
Celsus follows the system of Archigenes. He says, “κρίσιμοι dies erant,
dies tertius, quintus, septimus, nonus, undecimus, quartus-decimus,
unus et vicesimus; ita ut summa potentia septimo, deinde quarto-decimo,
deinde uni et vicesimo daretur.” But he does not hesitate, afterwards,
to express his distrust in the whole system; for, he adds, “verum in his
quidem antiquos tunc celebres Pythagorici numeri fefellerunt; cum hic
quoque medicus non numerare dies debeat, sed ipsas accessiones intueri.”
The Greek writers subsequent to Galen adopt his system, with little or no
alteration. Aëtius arranges the critical days thus: First in order, the
7th and 14th; then the 9th and 11th; next to them the 17th and 5th; then,
the 4th; and afterwards the 3d and 20th. The 6th is usually bad.
The last of the ancient authorities, Actuarius, is very full and
confident in laying down the received doctrines, with regard to the
critical days. He follows Galen.
The Arabians, with scarce one exception, adopt the Galenic system.
Avicenna, who treats of the critical days very fully, mentions the list
of them given by Hippocrates and Galen, and also that by Archigenes, but
decides in favour of the former.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account