The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
Alexander states that the continual fevers (συνεχεῖς) differ from the
intermittents, solely from the humours which occasion the former being of
a thicker nature.
Our author’s account is nearly copied word for word from Oribasius.
Actuarius remarks that the synochus proceeds from an ebullition of
the blood, and the continual fever (συνεχὴς) from putrefaction of the
different humours.
Nonnus states very distinctly the difference between the synochus and
continual fever. In the latter, he says, there is an incomplete remission
of the febrile symptoms, but in the former there is no remission at all.
Synesius and Constantinus Africanus adopt the distinction between the
synochus and continual fever, as stated by Galen.
Leo says, a continual fever has no intermission, but merely a remission
and abatement of the fever in the decline of the paroxyms.
Celsus, although he does not describe the _febres continuæ_ particularly,
seems to allude to them in the following account of the quotidians:
“Rursus aliæ sic desinunt, ut ex toto sequatur integritas; aliæ sic, ut
aliquantum quidem minuatur ex febre, nihilominus tamen quædam reliquiæ
remaneant, donec altera accessio accedat; ac sæpe aliæ vix quidquam aut
nihil remittant, sed ita ut continuent.”
In the works of Rhases, the distinction between the continual and
synochous fevers is clearly pointed out. He states that the synochus, or
_continens_, is a fever which consists of one paroxysm from beginning
to end; whereas the continual, called συνεχὴς by the Greeks, and _f.
continua_ by the Romans, is allied to the intermittents.
In the barbarous translation of Alsaharavius, there is some difficulty
in recognizing this distinction. He first describes a fever, which he
denominates _synocha_, which arises, he says, from inflammation of the
blood, and is marked by redness of the face, headach, and difficulty of
breathing. Second, nearly allied to it is the synochus or februs continua
(it ought to be _f. continens_), which arises from putrefaction of the
blood. Third, the febris quotidiana, the febris tertiana continua,
and the febris quartana continua, which are distinguished from their
corresponding intermittents by being attended with a partial remission
and not a complete intermission of the febrile symptoms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account