The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
The earlier ancient authors appear to have entertained no suspicions
of contagion as a cause of febrile or of other complaints. Homer,
as formerly stated, evidently refers the origin of the plague which
prevailed in the Grecian army during the siege of Troy to the heat of the
sun. The works of the fathers of History and of Medicine have likewise
been ransacked in vain, for any traces of the doctrine of contagion.
Thucydides, therefore, appears to be the first author (if we except the
Mosaic description of leprosy) who makes any positive allusion to the
contagious nature of diseases. From his description of the plague of
Athens, there can be no doubt that he wishes it to be understood, that
the disease was transmitted from one person to another; for he mentions
that physicians were more attacked by it than any others, as having most
intercourse with the sick; and he afterwards describes the terror which
the citizens felt to approach those labouring under the disease, and
intimates that it was often contracted by such intercourse. The language
of Lucretius, who copies his description, and gives it a poetical form,
is still more precise:—
“——nullo cessabant tempore apisci
Ex aliis alios avidi contagia morbi.”
(L. 1235.)
And afterwards,
“Qui fuerant autem præsto contagibus ibant.”
(L. 1241.)
Ovid, in like manner, says of the dead bodies:
“Afflatuque nocent et agunt contagia latè.”
(Metam. v, 551.)
And so also, Silius Italicus:
“Et posuere avidæ mortis contagia pestes.”
(Lib. xiv.)
The historians we must dismiss in a few words, with stating that
allusions to the infectious nature of certain diseases are to be met
with in Livy, Dionysius the Halicarnassian, Diodorus Siculus, Appian,
Plutarch, Quintus Curtius, Dio Cassius, Eusebius, Gregory of Nyssa, and
Evagrius. Procopius was a non-contagionist.
The philosopher Aristotle, in one of his problems, makes it a question
why the plague is the only disease which infects those who approach the
sick. (Probl. i.) There is a curious passage in the works of the orator
Isocrates, which shows that consumption was reckoned contagious in his
days. (Æginet.) The elder Pliny mentions the contagion of the pestilence.
(Hist. Nat. xxxiii, 80.)
Virgil mentions the infectious nature of certain diseases of cattle.
(Ecl. i, Georg. iii, 464.) The ancient writers on veterinary surgery and
agriculture in like manner state that the plague and scabies of cattle
are infectious. See Columella (vi, 5); Vegetius (Mulomed. iii, 23.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account