The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. Miller says that the glaucium is called horned poppy because
it is a species of poppy having husks resembling horns. See some account
of it in Apuleius (53.) Schulze remarks that Dioscorides has described
several varieties of the poppy. 1, Papaver hortense; 2, P. opiiferum; 3,
P. agreste; 4, P. rhæas; 5, P. ceratites sive corniculatum; 6, Hypecoum.
The fifth of these, or horned poppy, is the glaucium luteum, Scop.
Dioscorides gives a distinct description, but treats of it as a medicine
rather than as a poison. (M. M. iv, 66.) None of the Arabians treat of it
separate from opium.
SECT. LII.—ON PHARICUM.
The substance called pharicum in taste completely resembles nard,
and when drunk it brings on paralysis, with disorder of the mind and
convulsion. After evacuation by vomiting, we must give the patient to
drink, along with wine, some wormwood, cinnamon, myrrh, or Celtic nard
(which some call saliunca), or of spikenard, dr. ij, or two oboli of
myrrh mixed with must or iris, and the flower of saffron with wine. The
head is to be shaven, and a cataplasm consisting of barley-flour, with
levigated rue and vinegar, is to be applied.
* * * * *
COMMENTARY. Nicander, like our author, compares its taste to that of
spikenard, and says that it proves fatal in one day, inducing delirium.
He recommends the same internal medicines, and also makes mention of
applying a stimulant cataplasm to the head, evidently with a view of
relieving the phrenitis. The other authorities recommend similar
treatment.
There is great disagreement among the ancient writers on toxicology
respecting the nature of the pharicum. (See the notes of Gorræus and
Schneider on Nicander.) The former remarks that many suppose it a species
of nard. Dioscorides (Præf. vi) and Galen (Antidot. ii) make it to be
a herb. Scribonius Largus, and Hesychius consider it to have been a
compound medicine. After balancing all the statements Schneider comes
to the conclusion, that most probably it was a composition from agaric.
Schulze is wholly undecided as to its nature. (Toxic. Vet. 21.) Sprengel,
in like manner, can come to no certain conclusion respecting it. (Notæ in
Dioscor. l. c.)
SECT. LIII.—ON TOXICUM.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account