The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. Hippocrates declares in one of his Aphorisms, that the sudden
evacuation of the matter in empyema, or of the water in dropsy, proves
fatal. He speaks of evacuating the fluid with an instrument called
τρυπαντρωγλητήριον, which Camper thinks must have been a kind of trochar.
Galen, in his Commentary on the Aphorisms of Hippocrates, (vi, 7)
remarks, that in his time the operation of paracentesis was in general
use, instead of burning. He states, however, that he had seldom seen
recovery take place after the operation. (See in particular Meth. Med.
xiv.)
Aristotle alludes to paracentesis near the conclusion of his work on the
‘Generation of Animals.’
Cælius Aurelianus mentions that Erasistratus, Evenor, and Thessalus were
advocates for paracentesis, but that Asclepiades, Themison, and Soranus
disapproved of it. He himself approves very much of the operation,
and answers all the objections which had been made to it. He says, it
relieves the fulness and difficulty of breathing, and prepares the parts
for the action of the remedies. He agrees, however, with the other
authorities, that a sudden evacuation of the water is attended with
danger. (Pass. Tard. iii, 8.)
Celsus gives a good description of the operation. Some, he says, perform
it at a spot four fingers’ breadth below the navel in the left side;
some do it at the navel; and some burn the skin and then perforate the
abdominal parietes. He directs the operator to be careful not to wound a
vessel. The size of the point of the perforator, he says, should be the
third part of a finger’s breadth. After the perforation has been made, a
tube (canula) of lead or copper is to be introduced and the water drawn
off gradually. The whole is not to be removed at one time, but a tent
is to be introduced into the opening, unless it was made with fire, to
prevent it from healing too soon. He speaks favorably of the operation,
unless the patient be much debilitated. (vii, 15; also ii, 10.)
Aëtius and most of the medical authors subsequent to Galen, mention the
operation of paracentesis, and approve of it.
Vegetius, the veterinary surgeon, recommends paracentesis for the dropsy
of cattle, when the swelling is not removed by purging. (Mulom. iii, 25.)
Avicenna expresses himself rather unfavorably of paracentesis. He says,
it ought never to be attempted until every other remedy has proved
ineffectual, and unless the strength of the patient be good, and he
can endure exercise, abstinence from drink, and restricted diet. His
description of the operation is taken from Paulus. (iii, 14; iv, 13.)
Serapion mentions the operation in very brief terms. (iv, 7.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account