Crime -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century; London (England) -- Moral conditions; London (England) -- Social conditions
“Parliament has attempted to deal with the matter by legislation, as
in the ‘Act for Preventing the Adulteration of Articles of Food or
Drink’ of 1860; but as the Act is only permissive, little or no
effect has been given to it. Even in those places, as in the City of
London, where it has been put into operation, and public analysts
have been appointed, no good has resulted from it; in fact, it stands
upon the statute-book as a dead letter. Speaking of the City, I may
say that every inducement has been offered for the effective working
of the Act, but nothing has come of it. In olden times, the remedies
for such misdemeanours were quick and effectual. In the _Assisa
panis_, for example, as set forth in _Liber Albus_, there are not
only the strictest regulations concerning the manner in which the
business of the baker is to be conducted, but there are also
penalties for failing in the same. ‘If any default,’ it says, ‘shall
be found in the bread of a baker in the city, the first time, let him
be drawn upon a hurdle from the Guildhall to his own house through
the great streets where there be most people assembled; and through
the great streets which are most dirty, with the faulty loaf hanging
about his neck. If a second time he shall be found committing the
same offence, let him be drawn from the Guildhall, through the great
street of Chepe in manner aforesaid to the pillory, and let him be
put upon the pillory and remain there at least one hour in the day;
and the third time that such default shall be found, he shall be
drawn, and the oven shall be pulled down, and the baker made to
forswear the trade within the city for ever.’ It further tells us,
that William de Stratford suffered this punishment for selling bread
of short weight, and John de Strode ‘for making bread of filth and
cobwebs.’ One hoary-headed offender was excused the hurdle on
account of his age and the severity of the season; and it would seem
that the last time the punishment was inflicted was in the sixteenth
year of the reign of Henry VI., when Simon Frensshe was so drawn. A
like punishment was awarded to butchers and vintners for fraudulent
dealings; for we are told that a butcher was paraded through the
streets with his face to the horse’s tail for selling measly bacon at
market, and that the next day he was set in the pillory with two
great pieces of his measly bacon over his head, and a writing which
set forth his crimes. In the judgments recorded in _Liber Albus_
there are twenty-three cases in which the pillory was awarded for
selling putrid meat, fish, or poultry; thirteen for unlawful dealings
of bakers, and six for the misdemeanours of vintners and wine
dealers. Verily we have degenerated in these matters.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account