Crime -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century; London (England) -- Moral conditions; London (England) -- Social conditions
“I was shown in the east and south sides of London what I may almost
say were scores of men, about whom the detectives, who accompanied
me, expressed grave doubts as to my life being safe among them for a
single hour, if it were known I had £20 or £30 about me; and above
all, if the crime of knocking me on the head could be committed under
such circumstances as would afford fair probabilities of eluding
detection. I don’t mean to say that these desperate criminals are
confined to any particular quarter of London; unfortunately they are
not, or if they were, there is only one particular quarter in which
we should wish to see them all confined, and that is Newgate. But no
matter how numerous they may be elsewhere, there is certainly one
quarter in which they are pre-eminently abundant, and that is around
the alleys of the Borough. Here are to be found, not only the lowest
description of infamous houses, but the very nests and nurseries of
crime. The great mass of the class here is simply incorrigible.
Their hand is against every man; their life is one continuous
conspiracy against the usages of property and safety of society.
They have been suckled, cradled and hardened in scenes of guilt,
intemperance, and profligacy. Here are to be found the lowest of the
low class of beershops in London, and probably in the world, the
acknowledged haunts of “smashers,” burglars, thieves and forgers.
There is hardly a grade in crime, the chief representatives of which
may not be met among the purlieus of the Borough. There are people
who have been convicted over and over again, but there are also
hundreds of known ruffians who are as yet unconvicted, and who, by
marvellous good luck, as well as by subtle cunning, have managed up
to the present time to elude detection. It is the greatest error to
suppose that all, or even a majority of the criminal classes are
continually passing through the hands of justice. Griffith, the
hank-note forger, who was tried, I think, in 1862, stated in prison
that he had carried on the printing of counterfeit notes for more
than 15 years. Of course this man was sedulous in concealing his
occupation from the police, but there are hundreds of others who
almost openly follow equally criminal and far more dangerous pursuits
with whom the police cannot interfere. Our present business should
be to look up these vagabonds, and our future vocation to destroy
their recognised haunts. It is no good killing one wasp when we
leave the nest untouched. Thieves, it must be remembered, are a
complete fraternity, and have a perfect organization among
themselves. The quarter round Kent Street, in the Borough, for
instance, is almost wholly tenanted by them, and the houses they
occupy are very good property, for thieves will pay almost any amount
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account