Crime -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century; London (England) -- Moral conditions; London (England) -- Social conditions
“Rose Burton, keeper of a refreshment-house in Jermyn-street, lately
known as Kate Franks, appeared to answer two summonses for harbouring
prostitutes. The police gave the usual evidence. They visited the
house at night. They found men and women there; the women known
prostitutes, some taking refreshment. There was no disorder, and the
usual signal by ringing a bell had been given when the police
presented themselves at the house. For the defence it was urged,
that the evidence was similar to that given before the Middlesex
magistrates on appeal, after hearing which they quashed the
conviction, and that the magistrate should dismiss the summonses.
Mr. Knox said he must send the case to the Sessions in order to get a
clear declaration of what was meant. If the judgment of the Court
was against him, he must wash his hands of the matter. He should
inflict the reduced fine of 10_s._ in order that the conviction
should be taken to the Sessions. Mr. Froggatt asked for a decision
in the second case. Mr. Knox would act in it the same as in the last
case. It was, so to say, a last desperate effort. If he failed, his
honest determination was to take no further trouble in the matter;
but to report to the Home Office that the efforts to reform the
condition of the Haymarket had entirely broken down. Mr. Edward
Lewis, after some consultation with Mr. Allen jun. and Mr. Froggatt,
said that, owing to technical difficulties, it would be impossible to
get an appeal to Quarter Sessions before the 24th July. Mr. Knox
said that would be too late for Parliament to deal with the matter,
as the session would most probably close early in August. There was
no help for it; the nighthouse-keepers must go on in their own way;
the police might give up their supervision and refrain from taking
out summonses, as he certainly should decline to convict. He should
cancel the three convictions that day, and dismiss the summonses; he
was powerless, and therefore disinclined to enforce what for seven
years had been considered as law, but what had been suddenly upset at
Quarter Sessions. Mr. Knox then requested Mr. Superintendent Dunlop
to communicate what had occurred to the Commissioners of Police.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account