The Seven Great Monarchies Of The Ancient Eastern World, Vol 4: Babylon: The History, Geography, And Antiquities Of Chaldaea, Assyria, Babylon, Media, Persia, Parthia, And Sassanian or New Persian Empire; With Maps and Illustrations.Rawlinson, George
History
The Seven Great Monarchies Of The Ancient Eastern World, Vol 4: Babylon: The History, Geography, And Antiquities Of Chaldaea, Assyria, Babylon, Media, Persia, Parthia, And Sassanian or New Persian Empire; With Maps and Illustrations.
It may be doubted whether any gems were really found in Babylonia
itself, which, being purely alluvial, possesses no stone of any kind.
Most likely the sorts known as Babylonian came from the neighboring
Susiana, whose unexplored mountains may possess many rich treasures.
According to Dionysius, the bed of the Choaspes produced numerous
agates, and it may well be that from the same quarter came that “beryl
more precious than gold,” and those “highly reputed sard,” which Babylon
seems to have exported to other countries. The western provinces may,
however, very probably have furnished the gems which are ascribed
to them, as amethysts, which are said to have been found in the
neighborhood of Petra, alabaster, which came from near Damascus, and the
cyanus, a kind of lapis-lazuli, which was a production of Phoenicia. No
doubt the Babylonian love of gems caused the provinces to be carefully
searched for stones; and it is not improbable that they yielded besides
the varieties already named, and the other unknown kinds mentioned by
Pliny, many, if not most, of the materials which we find to have
been used for seals by the ancient people. These are, cornelian,
rock-crystal, chalcedony, onyx, jasper, quartz, serpentine, sienite,
haematite, green felspar, pyrites, loadstone, and amazon-stone.
Stone for building was absent from Babylonia Proper and the alluvial
tracts of Susiana, but in the other provinces it abounded. The Euphrates
valley could furnish stone at almost any point above Hit; the mountain
regions of Susiana could supply it in whatever quantity might be
required; and in the western provinces it was only too plentiful. Near
to Babylonia the most common kind was limestone; but about Had-disah on
the Euphrates there was also a gritty, silicious rock alternating with
iron-stone, and in the Arabian Desert were sandstone and granite. Such
stone as was used in Babylon itself, and in the other cities of the
low country, probably either came down the Euphrates, or was brought
by canals from the adjacent part of Arabia. The quantity, however, thus
consumed was small, the Babylonians being content for most uses with
the brick, of which their own territory gave them a supply practically
inexhaustible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account