The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to manGamble, Eliza Burt
Philosophy
The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man
Gamble, Eliza Burt
Sex; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
From the facts elaborated by our guides in this matter, it would seem
that the female is the primary unit of creation, and that the male
functions are simply supplemental or complementary. Parthenogenesis
among many of the lower forms of life would seem to favour this view.
We are given to understand that under conditions favouring katabolism,
the males among Rotifera wear themselves out, under which conditions
the females become katabolic enough to do without them.
Among the common Rotifera, the males are almost always very different
from the females, and much smaller. Sometimes they seem to have
dwindled out of existence altogether, for only the females are known.
In other cases, though present, they entirely fail to accomplish their
proper function of fertilization, and, as parthenogenesis obtains, are
not only minute, but useless.[24]
[24] _The Evolution of Sex_, 1890, p. 20.
So long as food is plentiful, the females continue to raise
parthenogenetic offspring, but with the advent of hard times, when
food is scarce or of a poor quality, the parthenogenetic series is
interrupted by the appearance of males. Although, unaided by the male,
the female of certain species is able to reproduce, he has never been
able to propagate without her co-operation.
Concerning the conditions which underlie the production of females and
males we have the following from _The Evolution of Sex_, by Geddes and
Thomson:
Such conditions as deficient or abnormal food, high temperature,
deficient light, moisture, and the like, are obviously such as would
tend to induce a preponderance of waste over repair—a katabolic habit
of body,—and these conditions tend to result in the production of
males. Similarly, the opposed set of factors, such as abundant and
rich nutrition, abundant light and moisture, favour constructive
processes, _i.e._, make for an anabolic habit, and these conditions
result in the production of females.[25]
[25] _The Evolution of Sex_, p. 50.
Among the lower orders of animal life, notably insects, we are
assured that an excess of females denotes an excess of formative
force, and that an excess of males indicates a deficiency on the
part of the parents. In the case of bees, the queen, which is the
highest development, is produced only under the best circumstances of
nutrition, while the birth of the drone, which is the lowest result of
propagation, is preceded by extremely low conditions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account