The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to manGamble, Eliza Burt
Philosophy
The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man
Gamble, Eliza Burt
Sex; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
That the greater size and strength of the male, together with courage,
pugnacity, and perseverance, have been of great value to him in
deciding the contests between rivals in courtship is quite true. It is
clear, however, that these characters are in no wise responsible for
the origin and development of the higher faculties. Even Mr. Darwin’s
premises, when carried to their legitimate conclusions, furnish
sufficient evidence to prove that the social instincts and the moral
sense have been developed quite independently of these characters.
According to the reasoning of the savants it is only through that
specialization of organs which has resulted in the separation of the
sex elements, and the consequent division of functions, that the social
instincts have originated, and that it is to processes involved in such
specialization, or differentiation, that the higher faculties and the
moral sense have arisen. It is indeed plain from their reasoning that
matter, or perhaps I should say the force inherent in matter, had to be
raised to a certain dynamic order before the peculiar quality of brain
and nerve necessary for the development of these faculties could be
manifested through it.
As there are different kinds of matter, so there are different modes
of force, in the universe; and as we rise from the common physical
matter in which physical laws hold sway up to chemical matter and
chemical forces, and from chemical matter again up to living matter
and its modes of force, so do we rise in the scale of life from
the lowest kind of living matter with its corresponding force or
energy, through different kinds of histological elements, with their
corresponding energies or functions, up to the highest kind of living
matter and corresponding mode of force with which we are acquainted,
viz., nerve element and nerve force. But, when we have got to nerve
element and nerve force, it behooves us not to rest content with the
general idea, but to trace, with attentive discrimination, through
the nervous system the different kinds of nervous cells, and their
different manifestations of energy. So also shall we obtain the
groundwork for a true conception of the relations of mind and the
nervous system.[43]
[43] Maudsley, _Physiology and Pathology of the Mind_, p. 60.
We have seen that the nervous system not only regulates most of the
existing functions of the body, but that it has indirectly influenced
the development of various bodily structures and certain mental
qualities, and that these powers of mind depend on the development of
the brain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account