The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man — John Shaqi
The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to manGamble, Eliza Burt
Philosophy
The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man
Gamble, Eliza Burt
Sex; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
The chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes
is shown by man’s attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he
takes up, than can woman—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or
imagination, or merely the use of the senses and the hands. If two
lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting,
sculpture, music (inclusive both of composition and performance),
history, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject,
the two lists would not bear comparison....
Now, when two men are put into competition, or a man with a woman,
both possessed of every mental quality in equal perfection, save
that one has higher energy, perseverance, and courage, the latter
will generally become more eminent in every pursuit, and will gain
the ascendency. He may be said to possess genius—for genius has been
declared by a great authority to be patience; and patience, in this
sense, means unflinching, undaunted perseverance.[50]
[50] _The Descent of Man_, p. 564.
Doubtless, for the purpose of strengthening his position, Mr. Darwin
quotes the following from John Stuart Mill: “The things in which man
most excels woman are those which require most plodding and long
hammering at single thoughts.” And in summing up the processes by which
man has finally gained the ascendency over woman he concludes:
Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman. It is, indeed,
fortunate that the law of the equal transmission of characters to both
sexes prevails with mammals; otherwise it is probable that man would
have become as superior in mental endowment to woman, as the peacock
is in ornamental plumage to the peahen.[51]
[51] _The Descent of Man_, p. 565.
Notwithstanding this conclusion of Mr. Darwin, in view of the facts
elaborated by himself, we cannot help thinking that it is indeed
fortunate that the law of the equal transmission of characters to
both sexes prevails with mammals, otherwise it is probable that man
would never have had any higher ambition than the gratification of his
animal instincts, and would never have risen above those conditions in
which he struggled desperately for the possession of the female. All
the facts which have been observed relative to the acquirement of the
social instincts and the moral sense prove them to have originated in
the female constitution, and as progress is not possible without these
characters, it is not difficult to determine within which of the sexes
the progressive principle first arose. Even courage, perseverance,
and energy, characters which are denominated as thoroughly masculine,
since they are the result of Sexual Selection, have been and still are
largely dependent on the will or choice of the female.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account