The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to manGamble, Eliza Burt
Philosophy
The Sexes in Science and History: An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man
Gamble, Eliza Burt
Sex; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
Mr. Tylor must have been mindful of the altruistic character of early
races when he remarked: “Without some control beyond the mere right
of the stronger, the tribe would break up in a week, whereas in fact
savage tribes last on for ages.”[61]
[61] _Anthropology_, p. 405.
Concerning the relations of the sexes under unorganized society nothing
may be known from actual observation, as, at the present time, no tribe
or race is to be found under absolutely primitive conditions. Perhaps
from no extant people is there so little information in reference to
the earliest human state to be gleaned as from the lowest existing
races. Among many of these tribes the rules which it has been necessary
to establish for the regulation of the relations between the sexes
are rigorously enforced, while among others a laxity prevails which
would seem to indicate an almost total lack of those higher instincts
which are observed among nearly all the lower orders of beings. The
following fact, however, in regard to these races, has been observed:
the more primitive they are, or the less they have come in contact with
civilization, the more strictly do they observe the rules which have
been established for the governance of the sexual relation. On this
subject Mr. Parkyns says:
I don’t believe that there exists a nation, however high in the scale
of civilization, that can pick a hole in the character of the lowest,
without being in danger of finding one nearly, if not quite, as big
in its own. The vices of the savage are, like his person, very much
exposed to view. Our own nakedness is not less unseemly than his,
but is carefully concealed under the convenient cloak which we call
“civilization,” but which I fear he, in his ignorance, poor fellow,
might, on some occasions, be led to look upon as hypocrisy.[62]
[62] _Life in Abyssinia_, vol. ii., p. 152.
In the West Indian Islands where Columbus landed, lived tribes which
are represented as having been “the most gentle and benevolent of the
human race.” Regarding these Mr. Tylor remarks:
Schomburgk, the traveller, who knew the warlike Caribs well in their
home life, draws a paradise-like picture of their ways, where they
have not been corrupted by the vices of the white men; he saw among
them peace and cheerfulness and simple family affection, unvarnished
friendship, and gratitude not less true for not being spoken in
sounding words; the civilized world, he says, has not to teach them
morality, for, though they do not talk about it, they live in it.[63]
[63] Tylor, _Anthropology_, p. 406.
The men who with Captain Cook first visited the Sandwich Islands
reported the natives as modest and chaste in their habits; but, later,
after coming in contact with the influences of civilization, modesty
and chastity among them were virtues almost entirely unknown. The same
is true of the people of Patagonia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account