The Sexual Life of Our Time in Its Relations to Modern Civilization: Translated from the Sixth German EditionBloch, Iwan
Philosophy
The Sexual Life of Our Time in Its Relations to Modern Civilization: Translated from the Sixth German Edition
Bloch, Iwan
Sex; Sexual ethics
NOTE.--That in Vienna the conjugal conditions so graphically described
in the above extracts are still much the same as formerly, and that
marriage needs and marriage lies are there exceptionally painful is
shown by the foundation in Vienna of a “Society for Marriage Reform,”
which sent to the Assembly of German Jurists, meeting at Kiel in the
beginning of September, 1906, the telegraphic request that they would
undertake a revision of Austrian marriage law, since hitherto no cure
had been found for unhappy marriage in Austria, no divorce was possible,
and those who had obtained a judicial separation could, according to
Canon Law, sue one another on account of adultery (_cf._ _Neue Freie
Presse_, No. 15108, September 13, 1906). It is hardly credible, but,
according to a report in the _Berlin Aerzte-Correspondenz_, 1907, No. 8,
it is true, that the Medical Court of Honour for the town of Berlin and
the province of Brandenburg, in the year of our Lord 1906, punished
physicians on the ground of adultery!
[155] P. Näcke, one of the most trustworthy authorities on sexual
anthropology, writes as follows: “That in ancient times, before
monogamy, there was polygamy, or even a state resembling promiscuity,
=is very probable= (Westermarck notwithstanding), =and can, in fact,
be assumed a priori=” (“Einiges zur Frauenfrage und zur sexuellen
Abstinenz”--“A Contribution to the Woman’s Question and to the Problem
of Sexual Abstinence”), published in the _Archiv f.
Kriminalanthropologie_, vol. xiv., p. 52 (Hans Gross, 1903). _Cf._
also Lohsing’s “Zustimmung zur Annahme einer ursprünglichen
Promiscuität,” _ibid._, vol. xvi., p. 332.
The question of sexual promiscuity has recently been further
considered by P. Näcke (“Earliest Beginnings of Human Society,” in
_Die Umschau_ of August 17, 1907). He believes that the state of pure
promiscuity lasted a short time only, and gave place to certain nuclei
of family structure, a kind of semi-promiscuity, which, prior to the
complete development of the family union, lasted much longer than the
state of pure promiscuity. Still, these earliest families were merely
temporary, and only later became fixed and permanent. This assumption,
however, does not affect the fact of a primordial pure promiscuity.
Näcke himself also recognizes promiscuity as the natural state of
primitive man.
[156] H. Schurtz, “Altersklassen und Männerbünde: eine Darstellung der
Grundformen der Gesellschaft”--“Age Classes and Associations of Men: a
Demonstration of the Fundamental Forms of Society,” p. 176 (Berlin,
1902).
[157] N. Melnikow, “The Buryats of the District of Irkutsk,” published
in the Transactions of the Berlin Society of Anthropology, Ethnology,
and Primeval History, p. 440 (1899).
[158] Marco Polo, translated by Yule, 2nd edition, vol. ii., pp. 38,
39 (London, 1875).
[159] _Cf._ my “Contributions to the Etiology of Psychopathia
Sexualis,” vol. i., pp. 165-169.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account